My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-05-22_PERMIT FILE - M2008010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008010
>
2008-05-22_PERMIT FILE - M2008010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:31:53 PM
Creation date
6/2/2008 11:05:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008010
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
5/22/2008
Doc Name
Response to Cooments Received from Ms. Nancy Segel and Mss. Catherine Neva and Debra Cross
From
McStone Aggregates, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
KAP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
McStone Aggregates LLC to DRMS, Response to comment letters 19 May 2008 Page 2 <br />feel very fortunate to have more than enough irrigation water to allow us to significantly speed <br />up the reestablishment of cropland grasses in reclaimed areas. <br />4. Air pollution issues related to reclamation. All agricultural land, including cropland and pasture, <br />has some potential for air emissions, but these emissions are generally regulated by APCD <br />and addressed as necessary. There are many areas of irrigated, semi-irrigated, and dryland <br />cropland in Montezuma County, and some do have releases of particulate matter. Those <br />issues should be addressed to APCD as appropriate. We believe that our property will have <br />better than average control of dust issues from agricultural operations, because of the <br />availability of irrigation water, and the post-mining changes in terrain. These will aid in the <br />reestablishment of cropland and grasses and provide for better shelter from the wind. <br />5. Existing pit issues: McStone Aggregates does not own or operate any other pits in the Mancos <br />Valley and has no control over those operations. <br />Ms. Neva's letter: <br />1. Items mentioned in the third paragraph (no. 25, no. 27, and no. 28) apparently refer to the <br />Montezuma County High Impact Permit. We understand-Ms. Neva's concern for the impact of <br />our operations on her property, and have taken those concerns into account from the very <br />beginning of our planning and application for this pit. We believe that we answered these <br />concerns to the satisfaction of the BOCC and made a commitment to the BOCC to plant <br />additional trees to further buffer noise and view of our operations from the Neva home. We <br />shall abide by state and county standards for noise, odors, and dust/smoke/particulate on the <br />shared property line between our land and Ms. Neva's. <br />2. All the information regarding traffic counts, sight distances, speeds, and existing access points <br />was made available to CDOT in our application for an access permit, which was approved by <br />CDOT (as discussed above). The CDOT access control and traffic safety persons responsible <br />reviewed this information, inspected the site, and determined that acceleration and <br />deceleration lanes were not necessary at this location. We are required to keep traffic limits <br />and to make improvements to our access point by CDOT before operating the pit. This . <br />information and requirement satisfied both the Montezuma Board of County Commissioners <br />and the Colorado Department of Transportation. <br />3. We believe that we can meet or exceed all federal, state, and local requirements for control of <br />emissions, reclamation, and other regulated matters. We have sought out the concerns of the <br />residents around our site and will always listen to and respond to anyone contacting us and <br />identifying potential problems, especially people who are our immediate neighbors. <br />4. The permitting of the site for washing and crushing of aggregate, concrete batch plant, and <br />asphalt (hot mix) plant is included in the DRMS application, but also requires issuance of <br />permits by Montezuma County (under the High Impact process) and by APCD. These permits <br />and the process of issuing (or denying) those permits takes the issues that Ms. Neva raised <br />into consideration. At present, the Montezuma Board of County Commissioners has denied <br />the specific request to approve the concrete and asphalt plants, pending litigation on another <br />zoning issue, but will allow us to resubmit those requests at a future time. If allowed by <br />Montezuma County and APCD, we do intend to have such plants operating on at least a <br />limited basis in the pit, at distances of several thousand feet from the Neva house. Such <br />operations would have to meet the same requirements for noise, odors, and dust as other <br />operations on the site, as mandated by county and state regulations and permits. <br />5. We appreciate Ms. Neva's love for the beautiful ponds on her property, and for the wildlife <br />which use those ponds. We have taken the need to protect and preserve those ponds into
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.