Laserfiche WebLink
III. COMMENTS -COMPLIANCE <br /> Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br /> during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br /> and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br /> This was a Complete Inspection conducted by Marcia Talvitie and Jim Stark of the Colorado <br /> DBMS. <br /> Roads <br /> The road leading to the permit area was dry and easily traversable. The perimeter fence was <br /> not continuous across the road, potentially allowing access to the portal area by vehicles, <br /> livestock and/or wildlife. <br /> Hydrologic Balance <br /> The sedimentation pond contained water, which had apparently collected from the recent <br /> snow melt. Evidence suggested the water level had been higher in recent weeks (Figure 1), but <br /> there were no signs that discharge had occurred. There is slight evidence of a rill forming <br /> through the approximate center of the portal area (Figure 2). The site should be monitored later <br /> in the season, to see if the slope is stable with respect to erosion. <br /> Topsoil <br /> One topsoil pile still remains: to the north of the sediment pond. The pile is well-vegetated and <br /> clearly identified with a sign (Figure 3). <br /> Fish & Wildlife <br /> Elk tracks were plentiful in the reclaimed portal area. <br /> Revegetation <br /> The portal area exhibits a variety of vegetation, whereas the sediment pond, which is still <br /> fenced, appears to be growing mainly Smooth Brome. <br /> Reclamation Success <br /> A segment of the fence separating the portal area from the pond area had fallen over, due to <br /> deterioration of the wooden posts (Figure 4). The remainder of the fence line, constructed with <br /> metal T-posts,showed no signs of failure. <br /> O.C. No. 2 Mine C-1980-002 19-May-2008 <br />