Laserfiche WebLink
ground water of Coal Creek. A geochemical analysis of the roof <br /> and floor rock and coal (see page III-D-37 of the permit applica- <br /> tion) failed to indicate any toxic or hazardous materials. In <br /> addition, seven years of ground and surface water monitoring, <br /> during which time similar wastes were being disposed of, indicate <br /> that water quality has not been materially damaged. Therefore, <br /> presently this potential impact is insignificant. The alluvial <br /> ground waters and surface waters will be monitored during and <br /> after mining to detect any further degradation of water quality <br /> if it occurs. <br /> The rock tunnel at the mine will be constructed in the Mancos <br /> Shale and proceed up the stratigraphic column until it intersects <br /> the Dutch Creek (M) coal seam. The tunnel has cut through the <br /> Cozzette and is now (6/86) cutting through the Rollins sandstones. <br /> • As a result, inflows of ground water from these potential P aquifers <br /> have entered the tunnel. The rates of inflow have been insigni- <br /> ficant. This is based on measurements of from 5 to 15 GPM. <br /> Inflows increase slightly during the spring snowmelt in conjunc- <br /> tion with increases in aquifer recharge. Any inflows from these <br /> sandstones will be pumped out of the tunnel, thus sustaining any <br /> base flow loses to the streams. As previously discussed these <br /> sandstones are too deep to be utilized as a water supply, and <br /> therefore no material damage will occur as the result of dewatering <br /> these sandstones. <br /> During low flows, fall and winter, water quality samples <br /> indicate some elevation of TDS, sulfates and SAR. It is believed <br /> this is attibutable to the Nos. 1 and 2 mine discharges and the <br /> old coal refuse pile. All stream flows are low thus dilution <br /> is not as high as in the spring/summer. None of the numbers <br /> 56 <br /> I� <br />