Laserfiche WebLink
h ` <br /> Cn e-aiiinaCion of the pond, 11 d-Continen that thC3 C <br /> • j_=?as 1 e alternative i � would be i t T'e <br /> _ .ib__ c t_� f A'O 1. C� 'O C:LIt, a :3GCO.�dary �pillc•Ta'_v 1...� <br /> Pond is concrete, and this sasri.ls loss Oisruptive. As ind?cc i:^d , <br /> the spille-ay would be a secondary �•Teir type spill.,.ay 2 fee - doe, <br /> �titil a crest width of 2 feet, to be cut into the existing coi�cr e <br /> pond. <br /> Re. the note about ponds 022 & 025. <br /> I had told Joe that I thought the pond designated 013 in <br /> the table submitted by Bill Stormes was actually NPDES <br /> 022. I was referring to a previous list of riy own as to <br /> which ponds required additional spillways. I had <br /> erroneously copied the NPDES number. The correct number <br /> is in fact 018 . <br /> Bill Stormes said he relied on the permit at Vol. 3 , App. <br /> II-B-7 Att. 1 p. 37 and Vol. 3 II-B-7 Att. 4, page 8 in <br /> doing the calculations. <br /> Yours truly, <br /> Diane Delaney �J <br /> • Mid-Continent Res. <br /> 50 <br />