Laserfiche WebLink
35% by volume. The proposed standard would allow for coarse fragment content of up to <br />50% in individual locations, with anover-all average coarse fragment content of 25%. <br />Notation 5 to the table indicates that, for prime farmland Lift A at least, the suitability levels <br />for total coarse fragments and fragments greater than 3" diameter, would be based on <br />weight. Coarse fragment suitability limits are typically presented as percent by volume <br />(initial calculation may be by weight, then converted to volume). Email correspondence <br />from David Dearstyne of NRCS to Edward Baltzer of Walsh Environmental, included in <br />Attachment 2.04.9-11, recommends sampling of percent rock fragment sizes and amount by <br />volume. In a letter of March 20, 2008 to Ross Gubka, Mr. Baltzer states that percent coarse <br />fraction and other information was recorded into a field notebook and transferred to Table 2 <br />of Attachment 2.04.9-11. Presumably, the coarse fraction estimates included in Table 2 of <br />the attachment, for the replaced Bench 1 subsoil substitute material, are percent by volume, <br />but this is not specified. <br />Please revise Table. 2.04.9-2 to specify that proposed coarse fraction limits are based on <br />by volume, or, if applicable, provide documentation to support use of limits based on <br />by weight. Also, please specify in footnote to Table 2 of Appendix 2.04.9-11, whether <br />reported coarse fragment % values are based on weight or volume, and provide detail <br />regarding the procedure used. Finally, please specify a Lift B upper limit of 35% by <br />volume for individual sample locations, or provide rationale/documentation to support <br />the 50% individual / 25% average limits proposed. The methodology associated with <br />the proposed limits should be consistent with that used to obtain the values reported in <br />Table 2 of Attachment 2.04.9-11. <br />5. The suitability level for selenium (2 ppm) appears to be relict from original permitting <br />activities. Current guidelines available from other western states indicate more stringent <br />marginal levels or suspect levels for selenium (e.g. 0.1 ppm suspect level in Montana, 0.4- <br />0.8 marginal levels in Wyoming). Colorado does not have aSoils/Overburden guideline <br />document, but typically we accept suitability levels established based on Wyoming or <br />Montana guidelines, or independent documentation based on relevant current literature. As <br />such, the suitability level for selenium may need to be amended. <br />Conversely, if previous soil sampling and sampling of Bench 1 overburden that could <br />potentially be placed in the root zone has documented the absence of elevated levels of <br />selenium, continued analysis of selenium within replaced topsoil, subsoil, or rootzone <br />overburden may not be warranted. Please address this concern, provide appropriate <br />documentation, and amend the table as appropriate. <br />6. The statement in the first paragraph under Prime Farmland Determination - 2008, that <br />there are 107.96 acres of 98E Map Unit in the permit boundary is somewhat misleading. <br />The 107.96 acres would appear to be the entire acreage of the Morgan property in the permit <br />area, southwest of the intersection of BB Road and 2700 Road. This property is dominated <br />by the 98E map unit, and the entire property will be treated as prime farmland. Limited <br />areas of the 98E map unit located to the east of 2700 road in the permit area are also <br />depicted on Map 2.04.9-1, but these areas have been previously reclaimed under the <br />permitted assumption that the units were not prime farmland. Please clarify that the 2008 <br />2 <br />