My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-05-06_REPORT - C1980005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
2008-05-06_REPORT - C1980005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:29:16 PM
Creation date
5/6/2008 2:23:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
5/6/2008
Doc Name
2007 Annual Hydrology Report TOC & Intro
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2007
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
suspected that the high fluoride values are related to this type of . <br />water chemistry (Hem, 1989, pg. 121). All wells exist within the Seneca <br />II permit boundary. <br />In the case of iron, the one Wadge Underburden well (7) exhibiting high <br />levels may have higher than usual concentrations of iron pyrite in the <br />rock. The high levels of iron displayed in the three alluvial wells <br />(32, 33 and 6) may be the result of organic matter and plant debris <br />present in the alluvium (Hem, 1989, pg. 77). All these wells have <br />historically exhibited high iron values and all exist within, or <br />upstream of, the Seneca II permit boundary. <br />High manganese values may, in part, be due to recharge from the spoil <br />aquifer, although high values are often common, especially in alluvial <br />material (Hem, 1989, pgs. 86-89) Manganese exceedances have occurred <br />at all alluvial wells, including the one Grassy Creek alluvial well <br />upstream of Seneca II (Well 71). It should be noted that, while the <br />CDPHE historically used a standard of 0.2 mg/1, the EPA states that this <br />standard is used to protect crops grown in soils with a pH value lower <br />than 6.0. In January 2008, CDPHE revised their ground water agricultural <br />standard to reflect this pH qualifier. In soils with a higher pH (as are <br />found in the Seneca II region), a more appropriate standard would be 10 <br />mg/1 (EPA, 1976). This year, none of the Seneca II alluvial wells <br />displayed a value higher than 6.05 mg/1, and no spoil wells displayed a <br />value higher than 4.99 mg/1. <br />Finally, water quality analyses performed on samples obtained at the <br />Seneca II shop well (STCS) for this year were compared against both <br />human health (mandatory) and secondary (i.e., recommended but not <br />mandatory) drinking water standards developed for ground water by the <br />CDPHE. No human health standards were exceeded. The CDPHE secondary <br />standard for sulfate, 250 mg/1, was exceeded twice with values of 340 <br />and 550 mg/1. Well STCS has historically exhibited sulfate <br />concentrations higher than the secondary drinking water standard for • <br />this parameter. However, bottled water is consumed at Seneca II. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.