My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-22_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (10)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
2008-04-22_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (10)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:28:22 PM
Creation date
4/30/2008 9:51:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/22/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Chapter II-B Appendix II-B-5 Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r~ <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Governor <br />`~a / 5~~~ <br />• <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director ~ <br />May 13, 1987 <br />Mr. Doug Bowman <br />Environmental Coordinator <br />Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br />Box 158 <br />Carbondale, Colorado 81623 <br />Re: TR-08; Sutey Expansion, File No. C-81-017 <br />Dear Mr. Bowman: <br />I have completed my review of TR-08 for adequacy. Specific deficiencies are <br />noted below and in the enclosed memo from Jeff Deckler. <br />Map 2 of 2 does not show the location of the intake for the new sediment pond <br />as shown on Map 1 of 2. <br />Are cutoff collars to be utilized for the new sediment pond and, if so, what <br />• will be the spacing? <br />I was interested to note the snow runoff index used in the USLE. Could you <br />supply a reference for this index. <br />From Map 2 of 2 it appears that only areas I, II, IY and V would flow to the <br />new sediment pond and the west collection ditch. All other areas appear to <br />flow to the east ditch and to the two existing ponds. Please clarify why the <br />new pond was designed to hold all the runoff. The capacity of the existing <br />ponds will need to be evaluated if part of the new acreage, as shown on Map 2 <br />of 2, drain to these ponds. The east collection ditch will also need to be <br />evaluated for adequacy of size if increased acreage is to drain to it. <br />For the Phase I, 1987 Pond calculations, Map 1 of 2 should have the drainage <br />areas labeled. The disturbed acreage given as 9.2 acres does not agree with <br />Division estimates of greater than 12 acres. The acreages need to be <br />verified. As noted previously, if the pile configuration of Map 2 of 2 is <br />followed, some areas of Phase I, 1987 appear to drain to the existing sediment <br />ponds. Therefore, the adequacy of these ponds would need to be evaluated. <br />If you have any questions, please contact me. <br />Sincerely., <br />Candace M. Thompson ~~ <br />Fp~drol ogi st <br />CMT/77Pj h 9 9 <br />9~QsFCentennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />- _. <br />~~ <br />_. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.