My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-22_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
2008-04-22_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:28:23 PM
Creation date
4/30/2008 9:39:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/22/2008
Doc Name
Adit/Rock Tunnel Project
Section_Exhibit Name
Chapter II-B Appendix II-B-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br /> <br />The final slope, not exceeding 2(H) 1(V), should be <br />strictly maintained. Terraces should be included if present in <br />the original design. The surface of final slopes should be com- <br />pacted to prevent erosion. <br />The construction of the outer shell of the pile should be <br />performed under continuous supervision of an experienced engineer <br />of Mid-Continent's staff. Periodically, the compaction of the <br />outer shell should be verified by in situ density measurement <br />using the sand cone method. <br />The surface of the pile should be vegetated as specified in <br />the Permit Application. <br />5.2 F,OCK TUNNEL DISPOSAL FACILITIY <br />The rock tunnel waste was designed to be deposited in a <br />facility with outer slopes of 2(H) 1(V), with two intermediate <br />berm, 10 feet wide. The maximum height of the facility was 50 <br />feet.~The reasons for the intermediate benches are not clear. <br />They apparently are not required for stability purposes as in- <br />dicated by the high factor of safety, estimated by all stability <br />analyses. There appears to be no reason to include these benches <br />(terraces) because of erosion control, as the slopes are rela- <br />tively very low. The original design recommended to place the <br />wash systematically in lifts and to eliminate end-dumping. The <br />t'r,ickness of individual lifts is not to exceed 12 inches and com- <br />pnction by the placing equipment were recommended for the outer <br />she 1 1 of the pi 1 e. <br />No specific construction and compaction methods were recom- <br />mended for the inner part of the waste pile, except that the <br />thickness of lifts do not exceed 24 inches was recommended. <br />The original design of the rock tunnel waste disposal <br />facility does not distinguish the stability conditions of <br />temporary and final slopes. In our opinion, the difference be- <br />tween temporary and permanent slopes is important. There is no <br />reason to maintain slopes to 2(K) 1(V) or flatter on the tem- <br />porary slopes. Temporary slopes are well stable at slopes equal <br />to the angle of repose of the waste, or some 30 to 35 degrees. <br />Our inspection and testing shows thGt the waste has been <br />deposited in horizontal lifts, as specifiec, and it was compacted <br />to an acceptable degree. The only exceptions are locations where <br />high moisture content of the fill, probably prompted by recent <br />snowfall, results in less sa*_isfactory compaction. In view of the <br />good quality of the rockfill and the extremely conservative <br />20 <br />.:~Y .., -., .. . . _. G ..5!DR000~15„~JlittlCs.iNC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.