Laserfiche WebLink
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1988-087 <br />INSPECTION DATE 4/2/08 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was performed by the Division in response to the operator's request for release of this Construction Materials <br />110c permit. The site has been in final reclamation for several years. The operator has performed the earthwork and site <br />clean-up, so no equipment or debris was noted onsite. There was no onsite activity and no operator's representative at the site <br />during the inspection. <br />The required permit ID sign and many of the boundary markers (T-posts) were observed at the site. It looked like the sign post <br />and several of the corner markers were missing, but they had been knocked down. They operator should reinstall them, <br />especially so that the permitted area is defined better when additional seeding and weed control is undertaken. <br />All stockpiles have been removed or spread, and there is no debris onsite. A thin layer of crushed gravel still exists on the level <br />western portion of the permit area, outside the pit, but native topsoil exists underneath, and adequate vegetation covers much <br />of that area. <br />The site had been seeded in 2005, according to materials submitted by the operator. Some portions of the permitted area <br />appear to be adequately revegetated, but some areas still require another seeding of the approved seed mix. The areas <br />observed that especially need better revegetation include the pit slope along the east side of the pit, the south end of the pit, the <br />north end of the pit, and some of the two-track dirt roads on the site. Many of the roads are becoming adequately vegetated, <br />but those that aren't may require some light tilling or dragging to incorporate the seed. <br />In combination with the inadequate reclamation vegetation in the locations listed above, many of those same areas also exhibit <br />stands of tumbleweeds (Russian thistle), which should be controlled as well as being seeded to grass. If good perennial <br />revegetation were present and established, the annual tumbleweeds would gradually decrease, and this annual weed would not <br />present a problem. By itself, though, it will dominate the area and preclude good vegetation. <br />There is a small erosional feature at the north end of the pit, where a minor amount of occasional upland run-on enters the pit. <br />This is still minor, and may not further deteriorate for many years, but it should be monitored as long as the site is still <br />permitted. It does not present a problem at this time. <br />The most problematic condition observed at the site, which carries over from the last inspection of the site, is the continued <br />presence of the noxious weed Black henbane (Hyoscyamus niger) observed in a couple parts of the permit. There are about <br />10 plants scattered on the east central side of the pit, and about 90 plants on flat unmined area on the west side, near the <br />permit ID sign. These plants are both large and small, possibly indicating plants from two prior growth seasons. This noxious <br />weed is a problem which the operator must correct. <br />The inadequate revegetation and the noxious weed infestation, in the context of a site that is being considered forfinal release <br />constitute a problem as shown on page one. The correction of these conditions will be for the operator to reseed the areas that <br />require better vegetation and control the weeds. There is probably sufficient time to perform both these activities vet in 2008 <br />depending on the recommended correct season for this work, even though the success may not be apparent until 2009 or later. <br />However, the operator must proceed to perform the seeding and aggressive weed control as soon as possible and report <br />such activites to this Division by the correction date, as shown on the last page. (Please note that the surface owner, BLM, may <br />be able to provide suggestions about these issues. See their address below.) <br />Due to the existing conditions at the site, showing that the reclamation plan is not complete, this office must deny the operator's <br />request for release. A formal letter will be sent to the operator under separate cover stating this denial. <br />No further items were observed during the inspection. Responses to this inspection report should be directed to the Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining and Safety, 701 Camino del Rio, Room 315, Durango, Colorado 81301, Attn: Bob Oswald; phone no. 970- <br />247-5193. (As of 10/22/07 we have a different room number. Please revise your records as necessary.) <br />Cont <br />