My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-04-12_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1999002
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1999002
>
2005-04-12_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1999002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:16:11 PM
Creation date
4/14/2008 10:07:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
4/12/2005
Doc Name
Major modification
From
US Environmental Protection Agenty
To
American Soda L.L.P.
Email Name
CBM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The original "Ground Water, Surface Water and Process Monitoring Plan" dated December 23, <br />1999, was adopted as Appendix J of the UIC permit. That plan, referred to as the Water Monitoring Plan, <br />included provisions for baseline monitoring and operations monitoring. Since the implementation of that <br />plan, baseline data collection has been completed and a substantial amount of operational monitoring has <br />been completed. The data collected to date indicate that revisions to the monitoring requirements are <br />warranted to better focus the data collection on meaningful parameters and cost-effective monitoring. <br />The existing data show that some parameters currently measured in the groundwater monitoring <br />program are not useful in determining if mining fluid has migrated into an aquifer. For example, some <br />parameters are not present in the mining fluid at levels that exceed their concentration in the <br />groundwater. Other parameters are consistently non-detectable, and still others are simply unrelated to <br />detecting a migration of mining fluid into an aquifer. Consequently, these parameters are being <br />eliminated from .regular monitoring while retaining those parameters that are present at significant levels <br />in the mining fluid and are useful in identifying an excursion of mining fluid. The current full suite of <br />parameters will continue to be monitored but at a reduced frequency of once per year rather than at each <br />sampling event. The monitoring conducted to date has shown that monitoring water levels (pressure) <br />provides the most direct and timely indication of a cavity leak. Water quality sampling has not shown an <br />immediate response to a leak. Seasonal variation in the water quality data is evident but the month to <br />month variation has been comparatively small: Therefore, during commercial operations, monthly water <br />level monitoring will be maintained while water quality sampling is being reduced to a quarterly <br />frequency. The proposed changes see table 3 which summarizes the wells constituents and freguency <br />of sampling proposed the temporary suspension period) also include modifications to the uses of certain <br />monitoring wells, such as we1120-4 that has shown it is contaminated with cement and should no longer <br />be used for water quality sampling. A monitoring program for temporary cessation periods is also being <br />added to ensure continuous ground-water monitoring even during periods when the permitee is not <br />actively mining. <br />American Soda with input from EPA, BLM and CDMG, developed an updated water monitoring <br />plan that incorporates the above modifications to streamline the monitoring program and focus it on <br />meaningful parameters. American Soda requested that the original Water Monitoring Plan, Appendix J <br />of the permit, be replaced with the updated Ground Water, Surface Water, and Process Monitoring Plan <br />for the Yankee Gulch Sodium Minerals Project, dated September 2004. <br />American Soda L. L. P. began an extensive monitoring program in association with permitting its <br />solution mining project to characterize the ground water of Yankee Gulch in the Piceance Creek <br />drainage.. Baseline monitoring began in 1999, 15 months prior to initiation of Phase I Commercial <br />Production. In cooperation with the EPA, BLM and CDMG, a monitoring network was established that <br />included wells up-gradient, down-gradient, and cross-gradient from the proposed Commercial Production <br />wells located in the 0-5 year mining panel. A chart of relative pump set elevations regarding the <br />monitoring wells is shown in Figure 1, which provides a graphic overview of the various water bearing <br />zones. The wells are grouped according to'the aquifer and zone. Only one alluvial well, Well 19-3, is <br />not represented on this diagram. Well 19-3 is a shallow well down gradient of the proposed site of the <br />evaporation pond. Well 19-3 well is not shown because the pond was never built and the well has never <br />had enough water in it to sample. <br />FINAL Addendum to SOB For Modification No. 9, UIC Area Permit No. C030858-00000 Page 15 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.