My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-05-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1999002
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1999002
>
2004-05-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1999002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:15:54 PM
Creation date
4/14/2008 10:04:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
5/28/2004
Doc Name
Pilot test for mapping of solution
From
American Soda, L.L.P.
To
DRMS
Email Name
ESC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The velocity model is then used by TRTTM to calculate the times required for a signal to <br />travel from each source to each individual node of the grid and back to each receiver. <br />Subsequently, for each node, the parts of all recorded seismic signals matching the <br />appropriate travel times are added together. For actual reflective structures, such as <br />cavities, faults, etc., the signals should superimpose, resulting in a large positive or <br />negative value (reflectivity number). If no structure is present at the node, the signals <br />should effectively cancel, resulting in near zero values. Contour plots of a specific <br />reflectivity number (positive and negative) are made throughout the survey block to <br />isolate and identify high-amplitude anomalies that possibly represent reflections from <br />actual structures in the rock mass. <br />In practice, several factors must be considered in solving a particular problem. For <br />example, there is a trade-off between the levels of detail obtained in the images versus the <br />distance that can be imaged. Large distances require a large grid spacing that limits the <br />frequency range of seismic signals acceptable for data processing and results in a <br />relatively low level of detail. Also, several filters are often employed to modify the raw <br />seismic signals to subdue noise and enhance features in a particular area of interest. <br />Section 2.0 Survey Procedure <br />The survey was conducted exclusively from the injection and production steel pipes in <br />Well 28-21 (figure A1). The nitrogen gas was released from the well and replaced with <br />the brine. The brine in both pipes provided seismic coupling through the pipe walls to <br />the brine and the rock mass outside for both the seismic sources and the receivers. <br />A string of 10 hydrophones at 20-ft centers was used as the receivers (see Appendix B for <br />technical details). The receivers were attached to a multi-wire cable and lowered to the <br />desired depth in the production pipe. The depth was precisely measured by lowering the <br />radiation detector into the parallel injection pipe and locating radioactive source attached <br />to the bottom end of the hydrophone cable. <br />Mining was suspended during the time of the survey, and the bottom of the production <br />pipe was plugged to simplify lowering the hydrophones into the pipe and reduce the <br />temperature below the limit for the hydrophones (figure A2). The surface end of the <br />hydrophone cable was connected to the seismograph for digital recording of detected <br />seismic signals. <br />A multi-barrel borehole gun operated by the Weatherford-We1lServ company was used as <br />the seismic source. The source was lowered to the desired depth in the injection pipe and <br />then fired to generate seismic waves. The charge for each barrel was adjusted to prevent <br />overloading/saturation of the hydrophones in response to seismic signals generated by <br />each shot. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.