Laserfiche WebLink
• 2006, following post Temporary Cessation reactivation of monitoring. The consultant that monitors these <br />wells has been Linavailable for the last two weeks. We will discuss the possibility of their monitoring the <br />wrong well(s), when they return. BTU-EC will continue to monitor these sites in order to determine the <br />reason for this effect, and will submit a separate letter discussing this anomaly in the near future, and in the <br />2008 AHR. <br />Wells TR-7A and TR-4 have historically indicated a slight reduction in concentrations of major ions over <br />time. Historically, all three wells have shown a reduction in concentrations of iron which shows considerable <br />variation in concentrations. The general reduction in iron concentrations may be the result of better purging <br />of well bore volumes prior to sampling. <br />The 2007 field parameter data for the two Twentymile Sandstone wells (No. 9 Mine Well and We11259), do <br />not suggest significant impact or trend. Water quality data for these Twentymile Sandstone wells are <br />summarized in 'Cables 13 through 16. Plots of field conductivity over time are presented in Figure 15. <br />Measurements during 2007 appeared consistent with historic values. <br />In summary, elevated conductivity values were detected in the Trout Creek and Middle Sandstones. However <br />the overall water quality of these, as well as the Twentymile Sandstone does not indicate adverse impacts <br />related to Mines 5 and 6. <br />Note that the 7 rTorth Angle well pump did not operate in 2006 or in 2007. The No. 5 Mine pump was the <br />only active pumping performed at the mine in 2007. A plot of the measured discharge for this point is <br />presented in Figure 16. Figure 17 is a monthly tabulation of flow measurements for 2007. The No. 5 mine <br />pump is run to maintain appropriate mine water levels. <br />• 3.1.2 Mine Waiter Discharge <br />Summaries of the; water quality data for the mine discharge are presented in Tables 17 through 20. The No. 5 <br />Mine well discharge is Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's (CDPHE's) Colorado <br />Discharge Permit. System (CDPS, a.k.a. NPDES) discharge point 003. The 7 North Angle discharge is CDPS <br />discharge point 024. Summaries of the available water quality data for the mine discharge sites are presented <br />in Tables 17 throi.~gh 20. <br />The No. 5 Mine discharge water quality (Figure 18) indicates dissolved solids concentrations consistent with <br />historic values (t:ypically under 1000 mg/L), consistent with pre-Temporary Cessation values. There was no <br />discharge from the 7NA well in 2006 or 2007. The average dissolved solids concentration for the 7 North <br />Angle averaged around 1100 mg/1 in 2000. Fluctuations were historically related to the accumulation of <br />water in the North Angle Sump location while the pump was out of order. This water was allowed to <br />equilibrate within old workings and subsided longwall panels. The maximum concentration represents the <br />equilibrium concc;ntration and also provides an indication of the expected post mining TDS concentrations in <br />rubblized zone of• underground mine workings. Likewise, this decrease illustrates the effects of flushing upon <br />the TDS concentrations with normal periodic discharge. <br />3.1.3 ALLUVIAL WELLS <br />Water Sediments in the Williams Fork River Alluvium are monitored via three alluvial wells in the general <br />area of the loadout facilities and underground discharge sediment ponds. These include wells AVF-3, AVF-5, <br />• Page 5 <br />G:~Environmental~EM PIREWHR~2007~Empire2007AHR.doc <br />