Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> Wyoming Fuel Company's (WFC) Canadian Strip Mine is located in Jackson County, Colorado (TBN, <br /> R78W). The mine was projected to utilize a phased open pit mining technique with two general areas of <br /> production. Pit #1 lies in Section 2 MN, R78W) and has been mined out with reclamation activities <br /> completed in 1987. The proposed Pit #2 lies in Section 10 (TBN, R78W) with no development occurring. <br /> 1 WFC discontinued all mining operations at the mine site in mid 1982 because of coal marketing difficulties. <br /> To comply with Stipulation I of the permit issued by CMLRB, an annual report of water resources <br /> ' monitoring must be submitted. The intent of this report is to comply with this requirement by presenting <br /> the data collected to date for groundwater investigations. The following sections contain the materials, <br /> methods and results of the groundwater and NPDES monitoring program in the Pit #1 area during the 1989 <br /> water year. <br /> GROUNDWATER <br /> ' The Canadian Strip Mine lies in the northeast corner of North Park, a large basin underlain by thick <br /> sequence of sediments. These sediments fill the large synclinal depression between the surrounding <br /> mountain ranges. Within this synclinal depression lie numerous smaller structural features. One such <br /> ' feature is the McCallum anticline with the mine site being located on its southern terminus. At this <br /> location, the anticline is breached such that the older rocks of the Pierre Formation arc exposed in the <br /> center of the younger strata of the Coalmont Formation. As a result, this area acts as a groundwater <br /> recharge zone for the Coalmont Formation. However, being at a high topographic elevation with no <br /> ' perennial streams, the recharge potential is limited to snow melt and major precipitation events. <br /> Fifteen groundwater monitoring wells were installed within the vicinity of the Canadian Strip Mine <br /> ' (Exhibit C-2) all of which are completed in the Coalmont Formation. Four wells were initially installed for <br /> monitoring the Pit #1 area. Wells 1 and 1C are completed below the Sudduth Coal Scam, Well IA is <br /> completed in the seam and Well 1B is above the seam. The rationale for locating the wells where they are <br /> was to monitor the down dip and down gradient effects on the groundwater system before, during and after <br /> ' mining. <br /> In addition to those four wells, ten wells were installed in the proposed Pit #2 area. Wells 4A, 5A and <br /> ' 6A are completed in the underburden below the coal; Wells 4B, 5B and 6B are completed in the coal; Wells <br /> 4C, 5C and 6C are completed in the overburden immediately overlying the coal; and Wcll 2 is located in <br /> unconsolidated surface material adjacent to Weir #1. All of these wells (except Well 2) were reclaimed in <br /> ' September, 1989. <br /> Well 7 was installed in late 1980. It is located in the reclaimed area of Pit #1 to monitor groundwater <br /> beneath the backfill. Additional information and lithology logs for each well have been provided in the <br /> ' permit document. <br /> Water levels in each of the wells have been monitored monthly during 1981 and 1982 and annually from <br /> ' 1984 through 1989. Water levels were measured with a Soiltest, Inc. Model DR-762A electric line to the <br /> nearest hundredth of a foot from the top of the well casing. Water samples were collected with a hand <br /> bailer. Prior to sample collection, a minimum of three columns of water were evacuated to obtain a <br /> ' representative sample. All samples were filtered with glass fiber filters, preserved and stored in bottles, and <br /> analyzed at Core Laboratories utilizing the methodologies as specified in Appendix 2. Those parameters <br /> which were analyzed are listed in Table 1. <br /> ' The physical characteristics of each well are listed in Table 2. Water levels in each of the wells <br /> (Appendix 1, Figure 1) have exhibited a relative increase in water level over the monitoring period. These <br /> water levels may be affected by the artesian head which exists because of the down dip locations of the <br /> 1 <br />