My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-03_PERMIT FILE - C2006085 (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2006085
>
2008-03-03_PERMIT FILE - C2006085 (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:24:01 PM
Creation date
3/25/2008 1:16:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2006085
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/3/2008
Doc Name
Baseline Vegetation Data by Kent Crofts of IME
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit J
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Prior to commencing the 2007 field sampling and during the preparation of this baseline <br />vegetation monitoring report, the vegetation sampling requirements found in Section 4.15.11 of <br />the DRMS regulations were reviewed and discussed with Ms. Sandy Brown of the DBMS <br />regazding the proposed sampling methods and data analysis methods to be used. Agreement on <br />the sampling methodology used in this evaluation as well as a proper understanding of the <br />recently enacted regulatory amendments was obtained from the DRMS prior to initiating field <br />sampling. In this evaluation, the vegetation parameters of production, plant cover, species <br />diversity and shrub density were sampled. It is expected that these data will be utilized to <br />evaluate the successfulness of revegetation efforts with respect to plant cover, herbaceous forage <br />production, species diversity, and shrub density. In addition, during the actual field sampling <br />effort, Ms. Sandy Brown and Mr. Dan Mathews of the DBMS inspected the site and additional <br />details were discussed with them at that time. <br />Vegetation Mapping: The boundaries of the vegetation types in the proposed Northfield Mine <br />Project facilities area were mapped by walking the vegetation boundaries with a GPS unit as <br />required in Section 2.04.10(1) which requires that plant communities will be delineated based <br />upon the basis of visually dominant plant species. Two plant community types were found to <br />occur in the area proposed to be affected by the proposed mine facilities area aJuniper- <br />Grassland Vegetation Type and a Disturbed Vegetation Type. <br />The Juniper-Grassland Vegetation Type, was found to occupy most of the proposed mine <br />facilities area. This vegetation type is dominated by an overstory of One-Seeded Juniper <br />(Juniperus monosperma) with an understory dominated primarily by Blue Cmama (Bouteloua <br />• gracilis) and Red Three-awn (Aristides longiseta). The Disturbed Vegetation Type corresponds <br />to areas that have been disturbed by previous actions on this site such as areas of mine <br />exploration roads, irrigation ditches, the old Chandler Mine railroad bed and a section of <br />Chandler Creek that was realigned either as a result of railroad construction work or the <br />construction of a large flood control berm that was constructed along the southeastern portion of <br />the site. Examination. of historic photographs shows that Chandler Creek was realigned over a <br />considerable section of the site and that the excavated filled obtained from this new stream <br />alignment was placed into an older section of stream channel to the north of the existing <br />drainage channel. <br />Transact Locations. To ensure that all of the areas within each corresponding vegetation <br />disturbance areas or reference area, had an equal chance of being sampled, each proposed sample <br />azea was treated as a single sample unit and a totally randomized sampling effort was <br />implemented. Utilizing the prepared vegetation maps, the extreme north, south, east and west <br />boundaries of each vegetation site sampled were converted to the 1982 Colorado State Plan <br />South Zone (NAD 82) coordinate system. The interval used in the state plan coordinate system is <br />based on foot increments. Given the typical real-time accuracy of this GPS unit of plus or minus <br />18 inches, all of the transact locations were field located at a sub-meter accuracy. <br />Once the boundaries of the proposed disturbance areas or reference areas were identified, then <br />using a specially prepared computer program which generates random coordinates, the potential <br />transact location coordinates were identified. These coordinates were then entered into the GPS <br />• 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.