Laserfiche WebLink
b. Surface Water Effects <br />The West Elk Mine has installed a system of ditches and ponds for <br />controlling sediment eroded from areas disturbed by mining activities. <br />Drainage from undisturbed land is diverted around the site. Almost all <br />drainage from disturbed areas is collected in ponds and treated on-site. <br />There are several small, isolated areas where drainage is not routed to a <br />sediment pond; in these areas, alternative sediment control methods (silt <br />fences, mulch, etc.) are used for controlling sediment. <br />A system of lined and unlined ditches convey water from the disturbed <br />areas to eight sedimentation ponds that have been constructed for the <br />surface facilities area. These are: <br />MB-1 Large upper pond <br />MB-2R Large lower pond <br />MB-3 Small lower pond <br />MB-4 Train loadout pond <br />MB-5 Bear pond <br />SG-1 Upper Sylvester Gulch pond <br />NSSA North Soil Storage Area pond <br />RPE ponds Refuse pile expansion area <br />With the exception of pond SG-1, all sedimentation ponds discharge <br />directly into the North Fork of the Gunnison River. The mine operation <br />has obtained the appropriate NPDES permits for the discharges. Effluent <br />quality for the sedimentation ponds has been monitored and will continue <br />to be monitored to determine permit compliance. With the exception of <br />occasional WET test failures for microorganisms, the mine has not had <br />re-curring problems complying with surface water quality standards. The <br />NPDES permit allows for a discharge of 10,000 gpd, based on a 30-day <br />average, from MCC's sanitary waste water treatment plant. The potential <br />impact of discharge of waste water effluent would be greatest when the <br />dilution ratio for effluent is smallest. <br />After mining is completed at the West Elk Mine, the underground <br />workings may flood to a point where mine water discharges to the surface <br />either through a perpetual drain that MCC may construct at the downdip <br />end of the workings next to State Highway 133, or as seepage from the <br />coal outcrop on the hillside south of the highway (if the drain is not <br />constructed). The maximum discharge is predicted to be around 100 <br />gpm. The discharge would likely be relatively high in dissolved solids <br />(on the order of 1,500 to 5,000 mg/1 total dissolved solids). The <br />maximum 100 gpm discharge would be diluted to near premining quality <br />by water in the North Fork of the Gunnison River, where flow is always <br />more than 4,500 gpm and total dissolved solids are less than 200 mg/1. <br />37 <br />