My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-03-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2020 1:43:49 PM
Creation date
3/25/2008 12:10:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
3/21/2008
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR12
From
add 1,517 acres/Dry Fork Lease
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Colorado Department of Highways approves the location of the West Elk Mine <br />within 100 feet of the outside right-of--way. <br />On August 6, 1981, the Division granted a variance from the road distance <br />requirement of Rule 2.07.6(2)(d)(iv). <br />The Division's notice of proposed decision approving the variance was published <br />June 29, 1981, and no comments were received during the ten-day public comment <br />period, which expired on July 8, 1981. <br />h) Three hundred feet of an occupied dwelling unless a written waiver from the owner <br />has been provided [2.07.6(2)(d)(v)]. <br />5. On the basis of information submitted by Mountain Coal Company in the form of Exhibit <br />11, and confirmation letter from the State Historical Preservation Office dated March 18, <br />1998, the Division finds that subject to valid existing rights as of August 3,1977, the <br />mining operation will not adversely affect any publicly owned park or place listed on or <br />eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places as determined by the State <br />Historic Preservation Office [2.07.6(2)(e)(i)]. This was confirmed for Permit Revision 12 <br />by a letter from the SHPO dated October 5, 2007. <br />6. The operator proposes no surface mining of coal; therefore, the documentation specified <br />by Rule 2.03.6(2) is not required [2.07.6(2)(f)]. <br />7. On the basis of evidence submitted by the applicant and received from other state and <br />federal agencies as a result of the Section 34-33-114(3) compliance review required by <br />the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act, the Division finds that Mountain <br />Coal Company, as of March 19, 2008, does not own or control any operations which are <br />currently in violation of any law, rule, or regulation of the United States, or any State law, <br />rule, or regulation, or any provision of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act <br />or the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act [2.07.6(2)(g)(i)]. MCC's <br />compliance review information was verified through the use of the U.S Office of Surface <br />Mining's Applicant Violator System. <br />8. Mountain Coal Company does not control and has not controlled mining operations with <br />a demonstrated pattern of willful violations of the Act of such nature, duration, and with <br />such resulting irreparable damage to the environment as to indicate an intent not to <br />comply with the provisions of the Act [2.07.6(2)(h)]. <br />9. The Division finds that surface coal mining and reclamation operations to be performed <br />under this permit will not be inconsistent with other such operations anticipated to be <br />performed in areas adjacent to the permit area [2.07.6(2)(1)]. <br />10. The Division has examined and is holding St Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company <br />corporate surety for $10,000,000 and Bond Safeguard Insurance Company <br />corporate surety in the amount of $4,000,000, for a total of $14,000,000. The <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.