My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-25_HYDROLOGY - M1982112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1982112
>
2008-02-25_HYDROLOGY - M1982112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:17 PM
Creation date
3/18/2008 4:00:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982112
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
2/25/2008
Doc Name
Water Lease with Town of Elizabeth
From
Southwestern Ecological Services
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
DEG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
operations will use 15 acre-feet of water per year (although it is my understanding the Pit can exceed that <br />amount to the extent there is sufficient replacement water). The fact is, Pit operations have been using far <br />less than the 15 acre-feet of water anticipated under the Decree. <br />a. Evaporation. <br />The Decree anticipates 2.33 acre-feet of water will be lost to evaporation annually based on one <br />acre of exposed ground water. This amount is less in years when the exposed water is frozen. <br />Since Mr. Hunt purchased the property in question, Pit operations have not exposed more than 0.5 <br />acres of ground water to evaporation. Thus, annual water losses due to evaporation have not <br />exceeded 1.17 acre-feet (0.5 X 2.33). <br />b. Washing. <br />The Decree assumes 3.86 acre-feet of water is retained annually to wash 100,000 tons of <br />aggregate. Annual aggregate production fluctuates from year to year due to a variety of factors. <br />According to the Pit operator, 45,829 tons of aggregate was mined and washed in 2007 resulting <br />in a depletion of 1.77 acre-feet of water (45;829/100,000 X 3.86). <br />c. Dust Control. <br />The Decree assumes 0.3 acre-feet of water is used annually for dust control. The Pit operator <br />has no reason to dispute this amount. <br />d. Stream and Transportation Losses. <br />The Decree assumes these losses tota12.8% of the water delivered or 2.8 acre-feet (2.8% X 100 <br />acre-feet j. These depletions are not directly related to Pit operations. Rather they result from the <br />flow of water from the Town's wastewater site to the Pit via Running Creek. We have no reason <br />to dispute the validity of this amount. <br />Given the above calculations, Pit operations accounted for water depletions of 6.04 acre-feet in 2007 <br />(1.17 + 1.77 + 0.3 + 2.8), less than half the anticipated amount under the Decree and far less that the 100 <br />acre-feet of water Mr. Hunt purchases annually from the Town. As I stated above, there is more than <br />enough replacement water for current operations as well as for any planned expansion of Pit operations. <br />I hope you find this information useful and trust it addresses any concerns raised in Mr. Rein's Letter. <br />Should you have any questions or require additional information, feel free to contact me. <br />Sincerely <br />f// <br />egory omas <br />enc. <br />i~ <br />c: Rick Hunt <br />Mark Heffner / <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.