My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-17_PERMIT FILE - M2008010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008010
>
2008-03-17_PERMIT FILE - M2008010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:25:19 PM
Creation date
3/18/2008 10:42:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008010
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
3/17/2008
Doc Name
Initial Review
From
Mancos Conservation District
To
DRMS
Email Name
KAP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />M - 2 008- ono kQ~ <br />Marcos Conservation District <br />P.O. Box 308 <br />Marcos, CO 81328 <br />March 14, 2008 <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board ~~~~~~~® <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 MAR 17 2008 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 ~ Division or ~eciamation, <br />Mining and Safety <br />Regarding: McStone Aggregate LLC application for a Regular (112) reclamation permit to conduct the <br />extraction of construction materials operations in Montezuma County. <br />Dear Board Members: <br />The Mancos Conservation District Board of Supervisors has completed an initial review of the February <br />application for Mud Creek Pit and have the following comments. <br />First, there is a larger perspective on construction materials extraction in the Mancos Conservation <br />District than is apparent from the McStone application. There is the Noland Cedar Point Pit that has <br />been operating since the mid 1990s, the Mud Creek Pit (this application), and a new pit to be established <br />on the Simmons property for which negotiations are underway. These three operations are on adjacent <br />parcels of land and when completed will affect contiguous areas on the western escarpment of Mud <br />Creek. We request that the reclamation plans of these pits be considered in consort so that the post <br />mining landscape has the proper drainage and land form to support agriculture or other uses. We also <br />encourage as much sharing of haul roads, access points to US Highway 160, and processing machinery <br />as is possible to reduce both the long term modification of the landscape and the short term aesthetic, <br />noise, dust, and traffic disruption of the community. The Mancos Conservation District is willing to <br />work with these entities to achieve this end, if your board thinks that would be helpful. <br />The Mancos Valley is a topographically enclosed area with mountains trapping air moved across the <br />Valley by prevailing winds. The Valley also has temperature inversions almost daily and in all seasons <br />that trap dust and aerial effluents neaz the ground causing more problems than in areas where effluend <br />dissipation occurs more readily. Therefore, it is crucial that rules be established and stringently enforced <br />that will eliminate particulate and aerosol discharge that might move beyond the described property <br />boundaries of the Mud Creek Pit. Where dischazges cannot be completely controlled, we suggest <br />placing those activities in nearby areas outside the Mancos River Watershed where dissipation and <br />dilution is more rapid. <br />The water rights associated with the McStone property (0.295 cfs of Priority #8 surface flow water from <br />the Mancos River and 85 acre feet of stored water from Jackson Gulch Reservoir) are insufficient to <br />restore irrigated pasture/cropland use to more than about 20-30 acres in our climate. The remainder of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.