My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-14_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2008-03-14_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:25:13 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 1:03:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/14/2008
Doc Name
2007 Annual Hydrology Report to Appendix A
From
Trapper Mining Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2007
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
defining the very small effects of upgradient mining but the changes are well within natural ranges. • <br />This monitoring indicates that if the HI aquifer has been affected in these wells by upgradient <br />mining, it has been very small. <br />Sulfate concentrations in well GMP-1 have been highly variable indicating an increasing <br />trend during the last two years. The water level in well GMP-1 had been steadily increasing for <br />several years prior to becoming fairly steady in 2002 and then gradually increasing the last three <br />years. Sulfate concentrations may stay variable even with fairly steady water levels. Sulfate <br />concentrations in this well should be influenced by the sulfate concentrations in the backfill aquifer <br />upgradient of GMP-1. The sulfate concentrations in well GP-3 had shown a gradual increasing <br />trend but concentrations have been steady the last five years. 4vera1l steady sulfate concentrations <br />have been observed in well GP-7. Sulfate concentrations in eastern HI aquifer well GC-1 have <br />been similar to the previous higher values in well GMP-1 and had to be natural until the last few <br />years. Therefore, a sulfate concentration of at least greater than 600 mg/1 is needed to indicate that <br />the increases may be due to the mining operation. The 2006 and 2007 values from well GMP-1 <br />increased to above this level. <br />Figure B-13 presents the sulfate concentrations for three 3rd White Sandstone wells. T`he <br />last six years of sulfate values from well P-S had gradually decreased after a large increase over five <br />years but the 2007 values show a small increase. The magnitude and timing of the sulfate <br />concentrations in well P-8 indicate that this increase is due to mining. The sulfate changes in wells <br />GC-2 and GP-9 are within the natural range of concentrations for this aquifer. Figure B-13 presents <br />the sulfate concentrations for well P-5. Well P-5 was dry the last six years. The sulfate <br />concentrations in well P-~ are natural and show that relatively high values naturally exist in this <br />sandstone. <br />Trapper Mining Company 3-6 <br />2007 Annual Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.