My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-14_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2008-03-14_REPORT - C1981010 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:25:13 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 1:03:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/14/2008
Doc Name
2007 Annual Hydrology Report to Appendix A
From
Trapper Mining Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2007
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Wells GF-6 and GF-11. are completed in the QR aquifer and QR backfill, respectively. <br />Bacld-ill well GF-11 is located on the downgradient side of the inactive E pit, while well GF-6 is <br />located downgradient of the pit. GF-1l is 1150 feet upslope and upgradient of GF-6. Overall <br />increases in water levels were observed in wells GF-6 and GF-11 for 2007 (see Figure A-6). The <br />head in well GF-11 is greater than 11 feet above the head in well GF-6. The waxer levels in the <br />backfill aquifer may be near the fully recovered level from mining. <br />Figure A-7 presents water levels for GP-7 and GP-8, which are located very near the <br />eastern boundary of the PA. They are completed in the KLM and HI aquifers and may provide <br />undisturbed baseline data for these intervals but could be influenced by mining for the last few <br />years. Water levels in well GP-7 overall were steady in 2007 aver a decline in 2006. Steady water <br />levels were also observed in well GP-8 after an increase was observed in this well in 2006 which <br />followed five years of declining water levels. Both of these wells are thought to be showing natural <br />responses but could be influenced by the mining that is greater than 1900 feet away. The larger <br />decline in well GP-8 indicates mining may be causing some of this decline. <br />Well GP-2 (Figure A 8) is located in a previously undisturbed area near the eastern <br />boundary of the PA. Wafer levels rose in the first half of 2007 and declined in the second half in <br />well GP-2 but have been overall fairly steady the last few years. A large decline in water levels <br />started in 1999. <br />Wells GP-3 and GP-4 are less than 1000 feet downgradient from A pit. Both are flowing <br />wells completed in the HI and KLM aquifers, respectively. Water levels in these two wells had <br />shown similar responses in water levels due to changes in precipitation but the 2005, 2006 and <br />2007 water level changes were different (see Figures A-9 and A-10). Water levels in well GP-3 <br />have recovered to above pre-mine levels in this area and show that any depletion of water from <br />upgradient mining has been replaced by recharge to the HI aquifer. The overall gradual declines in <br />water levels in well GP-3 in the years just prior to 2005 are probably a function of below normal <br />Trapper Mining Company 2-6 <br />2007 Affiual Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.