My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-12_REPORT - C1982057 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2008-03-12_REPORT - C1982057 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:24:48 PM
Creation date
3/14/2008 12:55:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/12/2008
Doc Name
2007 Annual Reclamation Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Project Abstract <br />Successful re-establishment of aspen on surface-mined lands in the western <br />United States is problematic, because the species regenerates vegetatively by <br />sprouting from parent roots in the soil which is removed in the mining process. <br />Previous attempts to plant aspen seedlings on reclaimed mines have failed <br />because transplanted root sprouts or seedlings do not have an extensive root <br />system to access water and nutrients for rapid growth. This research builds on <br />work previously funded by the Seneca Coal Company in western Colorado to <br />identify factors that limit the growth and survival of planted aspen. The use of <br />supplemental irrigation to help establish planted aspen was tested; and growth and <br />survival of three types of aspen stock on two soil types were compared. Soil and <br />water conditions were monitored, and the effect of weed control on planting <br />success was examined. The best combination of conditions for reproduction of <br />aspen on reclaimed surface mined coal lands uses transplanted saplings from <br />local sources on freshly placed soil removed from aspen stands. Growth was <br />significantly higher when weeds were controlled around individual trees. Irrigation <br />with non-saline water may enhance growth and survival in years with drought <br />conditions. <br />Regional Special Interest Topic: <br />Wildlife Conservation and Reforestation <br />Reforestation-Improving survival and quality, and encouraging reforestation <br />Project Description <br />Objectives: <br />1. Determine if supplemental drip irrigation will allow transplanted aspen <br />saplings to survive and grow on reclaimed surface mined lands at a western <br />Colorado site. <br />2. Quantify second and third-year growth and physiologic condition of bare- <br />root saplings transplanted to replaced topsoil, aspen sprouting from root segments <br />transferred with replaced topsoil, and nursery-grown potted aspen saplings planted <br />in replaced topsoil. <br />3. Compare irrigation water quality and characteristics of replaced topsoil to <br />that of water and soils in intact aspen groves located on adjacent un-mined lands. <br />4. Quantify the effects of mechanical weed control on growth and survival of <br />young aspen trees. <br />5. Quantify root growth and development of transplanted aspen saplings, <br />natural root sprouts, and nursery-grown potted aspen seedlings after three growing <br />seasons. <br />Background: <br />Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) is the most widespread tree species in <br />. North America (Baker 1925; Preston 1976; Lieffers and others 2001), and thought <br />to be second in worldwide range only to Eurasian aspen (Populus tremula) (Jones <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.