Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Figure 1. Elk density on the expanded and Seneca II-W Mine areas during winter aerial <br />surveys from 1994 through 2007. <br />20 <br />16.5 <br /> <br />Expanded area <br />Seneca II-W area <br />14.5 <br />---------14.~---------------------------------------------------- <br />n 13.0 <br />~. <br />~ 10 ----------- ------ <br />C <br />raj 8.1 <br />~_ 7.3 7.6 <br />W <br />s. i <br />5 ---- <br />1.9 <br />1.4 <br />1994 1995 1996 1997 <br />.2 10.8 <br />10.5 <br />--~3-g. ---9.4----c},~- <br />7.1 <br />5.. <br />-- ~ - <br />1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 <br />Year <br />Expanded survey area: 84.5 min (1994-1995), 89.5 miZ (1996-2007). <br />Seneca Ii-W survey area: 35 miZ (1994-2007). <br />densities in the expanded area exhibit a slight decreasing trend (Figure 1). The low density <br />recorded during the December 1994 survey was likely due to poor ground conditions (patchy <br />snow cover) and the use of a fixed-wing aircraft for the survey. These factors likely affected the <br />observers' ability to detect animals and resulted in under counting. Considerably more elk were <br />observed one month later, January 1995, when the area was surveyed from a helicopter. <br />Snowfall and snow accumulation, both on the survey area and in the general vicinity, <br />influence to some degree, the number of elk that winter within the extended survey area. The <br />high, observed elk densities in 1996 (16.5 elk/mi2) and 2003 (13.0 elk/mi2) occurred in years <br />where excessive snowpack was present in the higher elevations of the Williams Fork Mountains. <br />The deep snow may have deterred use of the higher elevations and ungulates moved north into <br />the survey area where reduced snow depths made walking easier and forage more accessible. <br />2007 Seneca II-W Mine Wildlife Monitoring Page 5 <br />