My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1995-07-18_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1984067
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1984067
>
1995-07-18_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1984067
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 11:44:31 AM
Creation date
3/12/2008 11:00:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984067
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/18/1995
Doc Name
Memo On Forfeiture Project
From
Paul Krabacher
To
Jim McArdle
Permit Index Doc Type
Reclamation Projects
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 18, 1995 <br /> TO: JIM McARDLE <br /> FROM: PAUL KRABACHER <br /> RE: COAL GULCH COAL BOND FORFEITURE PROJECT <br /> PERMIT #C84067 <br /> The Coal Gulch bond forfeiture project was initially bid out and awarded in <br /> late 1993. Mobilization occurred with very little work performed due to the <br /> frost levels and precipitation. Project work resumed in the Spring of 1994 <br /> and was delayed due to extraordinary precipitation. Project design originally <br /> consisted of backsloping all of the highwall cuts to approximate original <br /> contour with the waste that was created and moved to the southeast area <br /> adjacent to SH160. Also riprapped drainageways would be constructed at each <br /> natural upslope drainage location to direct flows into Coal Gulch. The actual <br /> revegetation plan also called for elaborate reseeding, mulching and other <br /> amendment efforts and the planting of tubling shrubs. Once the bid documents <br /> were downscaled to include the minimum earth moving and drainage construction <br /> portions it was realized that, after bids were received, insufficient funds <br /> still occurred requiring more downscaling efforts. After negotiations with <br /> the low bidder, Dirt-N-Iron, backsloping efforts would be reduced to leave <br /> approximate 20' highwalls (not incongruous with the natural cliff landscape) <br /> and drainages would be reduced or geofabric materials would be eliminated <br /> using on-site rock for lining. <br /> During project down time over the winter, a portion of the site at the <br /> entrance consisting of approximately 1.5 acres was purchased by a local <br /> contractor and was being used as a staging area for topsoil and organic debris <br /> (tree limbs, shrubs) as a result from road clearing operations. Coordination <br /> was needed for the locked gate. Project work proceeding during late Spring, <br /> 1994 without incident until an adjacent landowner requested that the <br /> waste/overburden stockpile be totally moved and his access road (Division of <br /> Wildlife's road) realigned according to pre-mining orientation. Ultimately <br /> the road was left in equal, if not better condition with minor water diversion <br /> and control construction performed under additional machine hours. <br /> The backsloping work was performed according to the revised negotiated <br /> specifications (to the 7,100' elevation) . The grades for the drainages were <br /> significantly low as to not continue drainage into Coal Gulch. It was <br /> discussed and approved with M. Long and other DMG personnel that a contained <br /> basin be constructed to ultimately perform as a wetlands. Drainages from mid <br /> site south were directed towards the existing pond. A drain pipe which <br /> extended from a previously sealed adit was extended with a riprap channel to <br /> the sediment pond. <br /> Revegetation was performed in the fall, 1994. The entire regraded areas were <br /> ripped parallel to contour. The entire area was left rough to accentuate <br /> successful revegetation. The entire site was fertilized (18-46-0) , seeded <br /> with a graminoid seed mix formulated from the permit, and was mulched using <br /> brome/fescue hay, species specific mulch obtained from a seed grower and road <br /> clearing organic debris as mentioned above. An early spring 1995 visit showed <br /> initial success with revegetation. Both ponds were being used by aquatic <br /> fowl. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.