My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:08 PM
Creation date
3/11/2008 2:44:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/22/2008
Doc Name
PDEIS Appendix C Subsidence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
opposite direction when the second adjacent panel is mined, i.e. the tensile strains are <br />additive over rigid gateroads. The optimum situation is for the 80-foot wide rigid pillar to <br />be only temporarily rigid as the second longwall face passes. The rigid pillar can safely <br />be allowed to yield and then crush after it is roughly 100 feet out from the longwall face <br />between collapsed gob on both sides. This, in effect, reduces the tensile strain, and <br />fracture opening, that is directly proportional to the differential vertical subsidence <br />between the gateroad and the maximum subsidence (Smax) over the center of the <br />adjacent panels. <br />3.3 Previous Mining <br />There is no known previous mining within the proposed coal lease. However, the <br />McClane Canyon Mine is operating in the immediately adjacent existing coal lease on <br />most of Sections 15, 16, 21 and 22, T. 7 S., R. 102 W., 6 P.M. A small coal operation, <br />the Munger Mine now closed and reclaimed, operated in adjacent Section 27. Figure 1. <br />Red Cliff Mine Project and Coal Lease Areas shows the location of these workings. <br />The McClane Canyon Mine map, Figure 6. McClane Canyon Mine Workings, <br />indicates room- and-pillar advance mining, without pillar robbing on the retreat, to <br />overburden depths just over 1,500 feet (generally 80 by 80-foot pillars on 100-foot <br />centers for 36% recovery). Pillars were robbed on the retreat from other panels at depths <br />of very nearly 1,300 feet. Total coal extraction (recovery) appears to have been as much <br />as 78% within two small (roughly 520-foot maximum width) irregular shaped panels that <br />were retreat mined to depths of 1,100 feet. The mine map indicates that robbing the 100 <br />by 70-foot advance pillars using a method called "christmas treeing" was incomplete and <br />erratic, with many 100 by 70-foot advance pillars and occasional 100 by 30-foot stump <br />pillars left within the panels. This method is no longer permitted by MSHA because of <br />safety concerns. In general, however, panel recovery was approximately 64% when <br />robbing pillars on the retreat, apparently leaving different shaped stump pillars when <br />retreating from different panels. The width of those panels ranged from 350 to 570 feet. <br />No observations have been reported of surface subsidence effects over the McClane <br />Canyon Mine. Estimates of maximum subsidence (Smax), tensile and compressive strains <br />and maximum slope changes were made over the five selected panels and are indicated <br />by number on Figure 7. Subsidence Predicted for Five Selected Panels, McClane <br />Canyon Mine. The method used combined the British National Coal Board (NCB, 1975) <br />method for longwall subsidence prediction and the room-and-pillar adaptation by Abel <br />and Lee (1984) presented on Figure 8. Subsidence Over Room-And-Pillar Workings <br />After Failure. Table 1. Predicted Maximum Subsidence For Selected Panels, <br />McClane Canyon Mine presents the estimated super-critical subsidence over each of <br />the selected room-and-pillar panels and the predicted NCB corrected subsidence for the <br />panel width with respect to depth. The predicted maximum surface subsidence for the <br />five panels ranged from 1.52 feet to 2.56 feet. Table 2. Predicted Maximum Strains <br />and Tilt for Selected Panels, McClane Canyon Mine presents the maximum tensile <br />and compressive strains and slope angle changes In addition, a rough estimate of <br />potential open surface fracture widths was made for each selected panel. This rough <br />estimate was based on the relationship between the vertical subsidence measured over <br />York Canyon Mine longwall panels with known widths and overburden depths, measured <br />surface fracture widths and the NCB predicted maximum surface tensile strains for these <br />known conditions permitted an estimate of the potential width of surface tension <br />fractures. <br />C-5 <br />DBMS 297 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.