My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:08 PM
Creation date
3/11/2008 2:44:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/22/2008
Doc Name
PDEIS Appendix C Subsidence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Maximum Strain and Slope Prediction Graph in Affected <br />Environment/Subsidence). The final graph provides various proportions of the <br />maximum tensile strain (+E) and maximum compressive strain (-E) along a <br />profiles from the center of a panel, across the side of the panel to the limit of <br />subsidence outside the panel (Figure 12. NCB Horizontal Strain Profile <br />Graph in Affected Environment/Subsidence). The method has been modified <br />by others to extend its application to room-and-pillar panel mining and to <br />consider the impact of varying proportions of sandstone, limestone and shale <br />or mudstone in the overburden. <br />• The NCB subsidence method is used directly for longwall mines and has <br />been modified for room-and-pillar mines. Reported subsidence predicted and <br />measured over room-and-pillar workings at the Roadside Mine east of <br />Palisade Colorado predicted 1.61 feet, measured 1.02 feet in the Cameo <br />Seam; the Eagle No. 5 Mine southwest of Craig, Colorado reported having <br />measured 10% more subsidence than predicted and the Southland Mine near <br />Canon City, Colorado predicted 1.51 feet, measured 0.89 feet. The NCB <br />method has been applied for subsidence prediction over a longwall panel in <br />the Mid Continent Mine west of Redstone, Colorado predicted 4.99 feet and <br />measured 1.71 feet; the York Canyon Mine west of Raton, New Mexico <br />predicted 8.1 feet and measured 7.09 feet. Subsidence was predicted using a <br />modified NCB method at the Chimney Rock coal augering mine east of <br />Pagosa Springs, Colorado predicted 2.59 feet, measured 0.49 feet. <br />6.1 Subsidence Zones <br />There are approximately four overburden zones to consider and analyze in the trough <br />subsidence process over a longwall panel. Figure 5. Conceptual Representation of <br />Subsidence Deformation Zones in Affected Environment/Subsidence presents one <br />such representation (Peng, 1992). There a four generally agreed zones of overburden <br />response to longwall mining. They are (1) the caved or collapsed zone, (2) the fractured <br />zone, (3) the continuous deformation zone and (4) the near-surface zones. These zones <br />are really transitional from one to another, and not sharply bounded. <br />6.1.1 Caved Zone <br />After the removal of the coal under the roof of a longwall panel, the immediate roof <br />collapses and caves upward to fill up the mined void. Piggott and Eynon (1977) <br />calculated the height of the collapse zone over a longwall panel in coal measure rocks <br />as 2 to 3.3 times the mining height based on a typical range of percent swell of 30 to <br />50%, see Figure 10. Potential Collapse Heights Above Different Mine Opening <br />Geometries. The collapsed rock is a jumbled mass of rubble that will be partially <br />reconsolidated by the overburden load. The collapsed rock no longer gives the <br />appearance of having been part of a bedded or stratified sedimentary formation. H.F. <br />Schulte (1957) reported that the height of the rubble zone exposed in a winze excavated <br />down into the center of a worked area was 2.4 times the mining height above the seam <br />floor. P. Kenny (1959) reported observing and measuring the active height of caving into <br />the original roof above a longwall panel to range from two to four times the mining <br />height, depending on the angle of repose, fragmentation, bed thickness and swell of the <br />immediate roof rocks. S. Peng (1992) reported the height of the caved zone is normally <br />2 to 8 times the mining height, depending on the properties of the immediate roof and <br />C-22 <br />DBMS 314 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.