My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:08 PM
Creation date
3/11/2008 2:44:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/22/2008
Doc Name
PDEIS Appendix C Subsidence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The magnitude of the maximum predicted surface extension strains presented in Table 2 <br />would develop roughly over the perimeters of the selected retreat mined panels, which <br />ranged from 1780 µs to 2860 µs. Extension strains in the predicted range from <br />approximately 1800 µs to 2900 µs on the surface would cause repairable damage, <br />ranging from cracking of single story brick walls to cracking of reinforced concrete <br />frames. The predicted tensile strains would result in estimated 1-inch to 2-inch wide <br />tensile cracks at the ground surface. The predicted magnitude of the maximum surface <br />compressive strains ranged from 1940 µs to 3000 µs, as presented in Table 2 should <br />have developed over the centers of the selected retreat mined panels. Compressive <br />strains in the predicted range would cause repairable damage to structures on the <br />surface. <br />The predicted maximum increase in surface slope resulting from subsidence over and <br />adjacent to the five selected room-and-pillar panels, presented in Table 2, range from <br />0.72% (0.41° or 25 min) to 1.22% (0.70° or 42 min). Slope changes of this magnitude <br />could adversely affect floor drainage, turbo generators and overhead crane rail <br />operations. Railroad switching Including all facilities, that depend on rolling of rail cars <br />could be adversely affected. Rubber-tired vehicles could be induced to roll at the grades <br />above 1 %. None of the potential structures or land uses indicated was or is present over <br />the McClane Canyon Mine. Increasing a short section of an already steep slope by 0.4° <br />to 0.7° could induce downslope movement. However, the direction that a panel was <br />mined and/or the pillars failed could also flatten a slope. Figure 9. Localized Mining <br />Induced Slope Angle Changes indicates the normally minor effect of the direction of <br />mining on a much steeper slope angle. <br />3.4 Multiple Seam Mining <br />Longwall mining is planned as the principal mining method in the Main Cameo Seam. <br />There are no plans to mine any other coal seams, because of the thickness and coal <br />quality of adjacent seams and because of the local 20 to 25-foot thickness where the <br />Cameo Seams split and/or merge. <br />3.5 Compression Arches and Load Transfer <br />Compression arches commonly develop across longwall panels where the coal has <br />been and/or is being mined, provided the panel is narrow enough and(or) deep enough <br />for both ends of the arch to span the panel width and bear on rock. These arches are <br />zones of tangential compressive stress where some of the weight of the overburden <br />overlying the arch can be transferred onto abutments; ahead, behind and on either side <br />of the longwall panel being mined (somewhat like the way stone-arched bridges transfer <br />their weight and load to the bridge abutments). However, some or all of the downward <br />deflected rock under the arch will bear on the collapsed rock under the arch. If the width <br />of a longwall panel is too wide or too shallow for the arch to span the panel width, a <br />smaller arch will form, with one side of the arch bearing on and compressing the <br />collapsed gob. The balancing arch abutment can be on the solid barrier pillar behind the <br />starter room, on rigid pillars in the gateroads and on the unmined coal ahead of the <br />advancing longwall face. The arch over the longwall face will follow the advancing face. <br />The arch abutment load following the advancing longwall face will progressively <br />consolidate the collapsed roof rock, the gob. If the face stops moving the face arch will <br />shorten in length and can add load the face supports. <br />C-8 <br />DBMS 300 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.