Laserfiche WebLink
1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />The following report describes the results from the October 2007 Sampling Event and analyzes the results of the sampling <br />• events over the past year. The sampling results are then used to establish background or "baselinep levels for the parameters <br />that have been tested in wells CRMW09 and CRMW16 in general compliance with approved Groundwater Sampling and <br />Analysis Plan (GWSAP) included in Technical Revision 2 (TR2) to the Lupton Lakes Gravel Permit issued by the State of <br />Colorado Division of Mining Reclamation and Safety (DBMS). Baseline levels have been modified in wells CRMW01, <br />CRMW02 and CRMW41 since there has been no active mining in this portion of the site and groundwater impacts from mine <br />activity is highly unlikely. Site wide baseline levels for dissolved iron concentrations have also been determined. <br />2.0 OCTOBER GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS <br />The October 2007 Sampling Event included monitoring wells (CRMW) 01, 02, 04, 05, 06, 09, 16, 40, 41, and 42. Two <br />recharge sites have also been sampled and reported. <br />2.1 Primary Drinkina Water Standards <br />Sampling results from December 2006 through October 2007 show that the Primary Drinking Water Standards (PDWS) were <br />exceeded for nitrates, fecal coliform, and arsenic. Following is a general description and discussion of results related to <br />PDWS analytes: <br />Nitrate (as N) exceeded PDWS in eight of the ten wells sampled across the site ranging from undetected up to 71.26 <br />milligrams per liter (mg/L). The site wide nitrate baseline levels proposed in 2006 were exceeded in wells CRMW01 <br />CRMW02 and CRMW41. These three wells are located in the northwest corner of the site well away from any active <br />mining during the sampling period and should not be considered to be influenced by mining activity. New baseline <br />levels are proposed for these three wells below. Nitrate levels in the south and north recharge areas both exceeded <br />the PDWS but did not exceed the site wide baseline levels. <br />• Fecal coliform exceeded PDWS in three of the ten wells sampled across the site ranging from undetected up to 13 <br />most probably number per 100 milliliters (mpn/100m1). Fecal coliform was detected in wells CRMW01, CRMW04, <br />and CRMW06 in the April and October 2007 sampling events. The test detection limit is 2 mpn/100m1 with a site <br />wide baseline level of 1 mpn/100m1. CRMW01 is located in northwest corner of the site well away from any active <br />mining during the sampling period and should not be considered to be influenced by mining activity. CRMW04 is <br />located cross gradient from the active mining activities and also cross gradient from an existing residence and <br />downgradient from an existing auto salvage yard and repair shop. CRMW06 is located downgradient of the active <br />mining area and cross gradient with a prefabricated concrete business. CRMW06 is also located within an active <br />petroleum remediation site with an air Sparge system. <br />• Total arsenic exceeded PDWS in two of the four wells sampled in April 2007 ranging from undetected up to 0.023 <br />mg/L. There were no arsenic concentrations that exceeded the proposed site wide baseline level of 0.03 mg/L. <br />• Mercury exceeded the site wide baseline level of 0.0002 mg/I in one sample from CRMW04 during April 2007. There <br />were no detections of mercury in the October 2007 samples. <br />• Fluoride did not exceed the PDWS or the baseline levels from December 2006 through October 2007. <br />2.2 Secondary Drinkina Water Standards <br />Sampling results from December 2006 through October 2007 show that the Secondary Drinking Water Standards (SDWS) <br />were exceeded for total dissolved solids (TDS), iron, sulfate, and chloride. Following is a general description and discussion <br />of results related to SDWS analytes: <br />• Chloride exceeded SDWS in one of the ten wells sampled in December 2006, April 2007, and October 2007. <br />. CRMW09 did not have a sufficient amount of data collected in the 2006 annual report to establish a baseline level. <br />However, with the additional data collected in 2007 a baseline level has been established for this well. The baseline <br />Annual 2007 Sampling Report -Lupton Lakes -1- January 2008 <br />