My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (39)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (39)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:23:08 PM
Creation date
3/11/2008 12:37:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
2/22/2008
Doc Name
PDEIS Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTERFOUR Environmental Consequences and Mitigation <br />Lease Area <br />The McClane Canyon Mine is located within the mine lease area, and is currently being mined <br />using room-and-pillar advance mining techniques to overburden depths of just over 1,500 feet. <br />In some of the panels, pillars were robbed (mined) on retreat to maximize coal recovery. No <br />observations have been reported of surface subsidence effects over the McClane Canyon Mine. <br />Estimates of maximum subsidence, tensile and compressive strains, and maximum slope changes <br />were made over the five selected panels and are indicated by number on Figure 7 in Appendix C. <br />The predicted maximum surface subsidence for the five panels ranged from 1.52 feet to 2.56 feet <br />(Table 1, Appendix C). The predicted tensile strains would result in estimated 1-inch to 2-inch <br />wide tensile cracks at the ground surface (Table 2, Appendix C). The McClane Canyon Mine <br />has extracted approximately 36 percent of Cameo Seam coal by advance room-and-pillar mining <br />at approximately 225 feet of depth, apparently without any chimney collapse to the overlying <br />ground surface. After a mine is closed progressive deterioration of the roof can result in <br />chimney failures, which at shallow depths can and frequently do breach the ground surface. <br />Areas where the overburden thickness is less than 200 feet above the Cameo Seam may exhibit <br />subsidence at some point in the future. <br />The additional impacts of mining on the lease area would be essentially the same as those <br />described in the Mine and Facilities section. Mining the tract would result in the removal of the <br />coal resource. In addition, any methane within the coal seam would be lost. Recoverability of <br />any oil and gas resource present in the geologic formations below the coal seams would be <br />reduced due to the limiting of drill pad locations. Total loss of the resource would not occur <br />because of the possibility to directionally drill into the lower horizons. <br />Railroad <br />No appreciable impact to the geologic and mineral resource is anticipated. <br />Water Pipeline <br />No appreciable impact to the geologic and mineral resource is anticipated. <br />Transmission Line <br />No appreciable impact to the geologic and mineral resource is anticipated. <br />Temporary and Permanent Impacts <br />Geologic Hazards <br />A landslide is a geologic hazard characterized by a perceptible downslope sliding or falling of a <br />relatively dry mass of earth, rock, or a mixture of the two. Rockfalls are geologic hazards, as <br />well, characterized by free falling rock masses. The degree of risk posed by landslides or rock- <br />falls to proposed development is variable, ranging from low (very old, well drained, gentle <br />slopes) to high (overhanging rocky cliffs with loose rock material on steep slopes and poorly <br />consolidated surficial deposits). In most cases the risk of future movement can be reduced by <br />appropriate design and construction practices (engineered excavation and grading) and by active <br />mitigation techniques, such as: control of surface and subsurface drainage; rock tieback anchors, <br />rock scaling, and buttressing. <br />A large rockfall hazard area and a landslide have been identified within the bounds of the <br />proposed Red Cliff Mine site and rail alignment. See Figures 4-9 and 4-10. <br />4-66 <br />DBMS 621 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.