2008-02-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (39)

Home Browse Search

CHAPTERFOUR Environmental Consequences and Mitigation An Industrial Corridor: Some mitigation benefits could be provided through clearer and more transparent communications about associated land use intentions and objectives. In the long run the role and authority of local governments in guiding compatible land uses, working directly with the community residents, will be vital to maintaining the rural quality of life within the Mack-Loma community area. Company Relations with the Community: Along with the other specific mitigation measures, a framework to improve community-company communications and relations is needed. This could take many forms, but should be based on an agreement between the parties to establish clearer expectations and open lines of communication about the mine and rail construction and operations phases. A commitment among all parties to establish a neighborly, working partnership will pay long-term benefits for community sustainability, towards more effective mine operations, and for employee well-being. Alternatives Carried Forward for Further Consideration Grade-Separated Crossing at CR M.8 The socioeconomic impacts under this alternative would be similar to those of the proposed action with two exceptions. The construction employment and expenditures for this crossing could be slightly more than those for the rail spur as proposed. If so, the temporary employment and income effects associated with the construction phase of the project maybe marginally greater than those of the proposed action. This alternative would lessen some of the sociaUcommunity concerns regarding traffic safety and noise impacts. Four-Quadrant Traffic Control Devices Socioeconomic impacts under this alternative would in general be similar to those of the proposed action. This alternative would lessen some of the social/community concerns regarding noise impacts. Transmission Line Alternative A Socioeconomic impacts under this alternative would be similar to those of the proposed action. Transmission Line Alternative B Socioeconomic impacts under this alternative would be similar to those of the proposed action. Transmission Line Alternative C Socioeconomic impacts under this alternative would be similar to those of the proposed action. 4.1.6 Transportation No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, mining development would not occur, and there would be no changes to the existing transportation system, and no construction impacts as a result of this alternative. Future traffic volumes within the project area would continue to increase as a result of energy development and economic growth in the area. Forecast growth rate estimates provided by Mesa 4-23 DBMS 578