Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTERFOUR Environmental Consequences and Mitigation <br />were to choose to locate in the area served by Fruita Monument High School, and if they were all <br />to arrive within a very brief period, say 2 years, then an estimated 133 new elementary, middle <br />school, and high school students would have to be placed in an already crowded system. This <br />scenario is cautionary, however. It is not likely to occur for several reasons: some of the new <br />jobs may go to current residents; many of the miners new to the area would choose to live at <br />dispersed locations throughout the Grand Valley; and the ramp-up to full production could take <br />more than 2 years, moderating the effect of the growth in the student population. In addition, <br />Mesa County Valley School District 51 may propose a bond issue to the voters in the fall of <br />2008. If a bond issue were to pass, then new schools would be constructed that would <br />accommodate anticipated growth in the west end of the Grand Valley. <br />Public Revenue <br />The Red Cliff Mine would be subject to various taxes and royalties that would produce <br />substantial revenue for local, state, and federal governments. Both Mesa County and Garfield <br />County would assess ad valorem taxes on the mine facilities, including the rail spur, and on the <br />value of the coal in the ground. Mesa County would also receive sales taxes based on business <br />and consumer expenditures generated by the proposed action. The State of Colorado would <br />recover a severance tax on the value of a mineral resource irretrievably lost to the state. The <br />federal government, from whom the coal resource is being leased, would receive an annual <br />royalty payment as well as an annual rental fee. <br />The federal royalty for coal mined by underground methods is 8 percent of the gross value of the <br />coal produced. When the Red Cliff Mine is producing at the proposed rate of eight million tons <br />per year, the annual royalty payment to the federal government would be $15.4 million, <br />assuming an open market price of $24.00 per ton. Historically, federal mineral royalties were <br />split evenly between the federal government and the state of origin, which would result in a <br />$7.7 million annual distribution to the State of Colorado. (A recent federal appropriations bill <br />changed the distribution to 52 percent federal and 48 percent state for 1 year. If this change were <br />extended by the Congress, Colorado's share of the Red Cliff Mine royalties would be <br />approximately $7.4 million.) <br />Severance taxes are imposed by states on certain nonrenewable resources that are "removed from <br />the earth" because "the value of such resources to the state of Colorado is irretrievably lost." <br />The severance tax on coal is applied to all production after the first 1,200,000 tons produced <br />annually. For underground mines, a 50 percent credit against the taxis also applied. The per ton <br />severance tax rate is currently $0.54 per ton and has remained at that level since 1992. (The <br />possibility of raising the rate is under review by the Colorado State government and legislature.) <br />When the Red Cliff Mine is producing at the proposed rate of eight million tons per year, the <br />annual severance tax imposed by the state could be $1.8 million, based on an assumed open <br />market price of $24.00 per ton. <br />Property taxes would be levied and collected by both Mesa and Garfield counties. Mesa County <br />would assess property taxes on the railroad spur and other properties within the county. Garfield <br />County, where the mine facilities and most of the recoverable coal are located, would assess <br />property taxes on the mine facilities and on the value of the coal in the ground. When the Red <br />Cliff Mine is producing at the proposed rate of eight million tons per year, the annual property <br />tax receipt due to Garfield County could be $710,035, based on the price assumption and <br />assessment methodology of the Colorado Division of Property Taxation and on the current mill <br />4-19 <br />DBMS 574 <br />