My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-01-01_HYDROLOGY - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
2007-01-01_HYDROLOGY - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:16:33 PM
Creation date
3/11/2008 9:59:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
1/1/2007
Doc Name
2006 water quality datea
From
Climax Molybdenum Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 <br />Climax Mine ACZ Project ID: L57358 <br />.- .. <br />L57358-01 WG208966 Aluminum, total recoverable M200.7 ICP M3 The accuracy of the spike recovery does not apply because <br /> analyte concentration in the sample is disproportionate to <br /> the spike level. The recovery of the method control sample <br /> was acceptable. <br />WG208923 Calcium, dissolved M200.7 ICP M3 The accuracy of the spike recovery does not apply because <br /> analyte concentration in the sample is disproportionate to <br /> the spike level. The recovery of the method control sample <br /> was acceptable. <br />WG208865 Cyanide, total M335.4 - Colorimetric w! M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample <br /> distillation recovery was acceptable. <br />WG208735 Nitrogen, ammonia M350.1 -Automated Phenate M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the method control sample <br /> recovery was acceptable. <br /> M350.1 -Automated Phenate RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG209168 Phosphorus, total M365.1 -Auto Ascorbic Acid RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> (digest) validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG208783 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C M160.2 - Gravimetric RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />WG208946 Sulfate SM4500 SO4-D RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br /> validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br /> accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />L57358.02 WG208923 Calcium, dissolved M200.7 ICP <br />WG209092 Chloride M325.2 - Colorimetric <br />WG208905 Cyanide, total M335.4 - Colorimetric w/ <br />distillation <br />L57358-03 WG208923 Calcium, dissolved M200.7 ICP <br />WG209092 Chloride M325.2 - Colorimetric <br />WG208905 Cyanide, total M335.4 - Cobrimetric w/ <br />distillation <br />WG208762 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C M160.1 - Gravimetric <br />L57358-04 WG208923 Calcium, dissolved M200.7 ICP <br />WG209092 Chloride M325.2 - Colorimetric <br />WG208905 Cyanide, total M335.4 - Colorimetric w/ <br />distillation <br />WG208762 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C M160.1 - Gravimetric <br />M3 The accuracy of the spike recovery does not apply because <br />analyte concentration in the sample is disproportionate to <br />the spike level. The recovery of the method control sample <br />was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too Icw for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the method control sample <br />recovery was acceptable. <br />M3 The accuracy of the spike recovery does not apply because <br />analyte concentration in the sample is disproportionate to <br />the spike level. The recovery of the method control sample <br />was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the method control sample <br />recovery was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M3 The accuracy of the spike recovery does not apply because <br />analyte concentration in the sample is disproportionate to <br />the spike level. The recovery of the method control sample <br />was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />M2 Matrix spike recovery was low, the method control sample <br />recovery was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />L57358: Page 9 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.