Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTERTWO Alternatives <br />A railroad spur is proposed to connect the Red Cliff Mine to the railroad main line near Mack, <br />Colorado, to cost-effectively transport coal into the market. The proposed railroad spur would <br />traverse approximately 9.5 miles of BLM land and approximately 5 miles of private land. The <br />railroad would cross BOR- and BLM-administered lands, which are outside of the proposed coal <br />lease area and therefore require ROW approval on these federal lands. <br />It is proposed to load the coal onto rail cars at the mine site and transport the coal via the rail <br />spur to the main rail line connection. The loadout would be comprised of a coal stockpile, <br />reclaim tunnel, conveyor belt(s), and loadout tower. Ethylene glycol would be applied to the <br />coal and coal cars to minimize freezing during winter months. These products are stored in tanks <br />located near the loadout structure. There would be an average of four trains per day (two full <br />and two empty) at a maximum production rate of 8,000,000 tpy, traveling at a speed of <br />approximately 20 miles per hour (mph) full and 25 mph empty. Each car carries approximately <br />100 to 110 tons of coal, and each train would typically consist of between 100 and 120 cars, with <br />three, four, or five locomotives. Trains would typically be 6,500 to 7,700 feet in length. <br />The trains would cross public roads in three locations. Proposed crossings include agrade- <br />separated crossing with SH 139 and at-grade crossings for CR 10 and CR M8. The train would <br />cross through these intersections a maximum of four times per day and would not stop on the <br />track as they cross the county roads. The amount of time that the trains would block the county <br />roads would vary according to speed, number of cars in the train, and whether the southbound <br />loaded trains would need to stop between CR 10 and CR M8 for mainline access. Estimates are <br />that the trains would block CR M 8 for 5.5 to 6.5 minutes, and would block CR 10 for 6.5 to <br />7.0 minutes. <br />The at-grade crossings have been designed to provide the maximum sight distance possible. The <br />average vehicle volume on these highways is low, and sight distance is generally good. <br />Proposed installation of crossing warning devices and two-quadrant gate systems with pavement <br />markings at the two at-grade crossings would provide additional safety measures. Figure 2-8, <br />Grade Crossing Safety Devices, depicts typical grade crossing safety devices to be installed. <br />Active warning devices that would give advanced warning of "train on track" would be installed <br />along the county roads before the crossings. A "wye" would be constructed to link the railroad <br />spur with the main line at Mack to allow uninterrupted train flow in all directions. <br />To improve the sight distance at the CR 10 crossing, CAM has worked with Mesa County to <br />realign CR 10 (Figure 2-3, County Road 10 Realignment). This realignment would provide a <br />longer time for vehicular traffic to see the crossing and allow CR 10 to cross the tracks at an <br />angle closer to 90 degrees. <br />Rail Alignments <br />Following UPRR guidelines for rail grades, slopes, and curves, a railroad alignment was <br />developed that would avoid, to the maximum extent practicable, key drainages, state parks, <br />irrigated lands, and individual residences. <br />Additional data and information have been collected since the initial rail alignment was proposed <br />in CAM's application for ROW, Application for Transportation and Utility Systems and <br />Facilities on Federal Lands, submitted to BLM by CAM on September 27, 2005 (CAM 2005). <br />2-33 <br />