My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-11-01_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2007-11-01_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:18:17 PM
Creation date
2/29/2008 10:54:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/1/2007
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.5 Postmining Land Uses
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ground Water Inflow to the Mine <br />The underground mining activities at the Foidel Creek Mine have the potential to drain ground water from the <br />mined coal seam, and overlying and immediately underlying rock units. Bedrock units overlying and underlying <br />the Wadge Coal Seam, which contain ground water, would typically have formation pressures higher that the <br />atmospheric pressure that would exist in any open mine workings. Consequently, if there is sufficient hydrologic <br />communication, there will be movement of ground water from these units into the active mine workings. <br />The overburden unit will be directly affected by the removal of the Wadge Coal Seam. Good hydrologic <br />communication with the unit may occur through natural fractures and, faults, which aze enhagced by stress-relief, <br />and subsidence related to the mining activity. Partial,dewatering of the immediately, overlying overbuuden unit by <br />gravity drainage is anticipated in active mine areas. Lateral movement of ground water in the overburden unit <br />~towazd the active mine aeeas will cause some dewatering and more general lowering of potentiometric levels near <br />the mine. ; , <br />Historic Inflows: The Foidel Creek Mine has been operated since 1983. Since that time, inflows and dischazges <br />have been monitored. In addition, future inflows have been estimated. Past inflow estimates have been made using <br />theoretical models. Since approximately 9,000 acres of azea have now been mined, the most recent inflow <br />estimates have been made using historic inflow rates to project future inflows. <br />The quantity of mine inflow and the resultant effects on potentiometric levels on the Wadge overburden unit were <br />studied using atwo-dimensional finite-difference, simulation model for the original Foidel Creek Mine permit <br />application (Exhibit 13, Ground Water Model Documentation). The results and predictions of the model were.used <br />in the development of a Mine Water Control Plan included in Exhibit 33. Most of the estimated inflow was <br />projected to occur as leakage from the Trout Creek Sandstone through faults intersecting the mine. This is based on <br />the assumption that the faults would act as conduits and allow for flow of ground water into the mine. The mine <br />has intercepted several faults, however, because the faults are typically in compression they are relatively tight and <br />inflows through the faults have been limited. <br />To date, June 2006, none of the faults identified in this report has yielded sustained inflows. In addition, no <br />evidence has been found that there is any significant connection between the mine workings and either the <br />underlying Trout Creek Sandstone or the overlying Twentymile Sandstone. Only two significant localized inflow <br />were encountered; one in the 6-Right Entry in late 1997, and one in the northeast mains fault crossing in August <br />1999. <br />The discussion of the historic inflows aze divided by mining areas: 1) The North Mains and portal aeeas (NMS); 2) <br />The 1st Panel South plus the Southwest panels (Panels 1-SW to 3-SW) plus the South Panels'(1-Left to 6-Left) <br />which will be called the South Mining District (SMD); 3) The East Mining District (EMD) consisting of Panels 2- <br />Right to 9-Right; and 4) The North Mining District (NMD) consisting of Panels 12-Right through 16-Right.. <br />Future mining aeeas are the remaining panels in the North Mining District (NMD) and the West Mining District <br />(WMD) containing the reserves to the north and west of the SMD. Mining aeeas and designations aze shown on the <br />Mine Plan Map, Map 23. <br />Inflows have historically been encountered in the NMS area. From 1993 to 2006 the inflows to the NMS (water <br />from overlyiong surface-mined spoils), as measured in the annual mine inflow surveys remained constant at <br />approximately 30 to 40 gpm. The conductivity of this water, which ranges from approximately 2,500 to 4,500 <br />µmhos/ctn, indicates that it is primarily derived from groundwater that has been mixed with spoil water from the <br />up-dip spoils. Atypical spoil well analysis is shown in Exhibit 49, Table E49-1. It has a mixed cation - <br />sulfate/bicazbonate water with a conductivity of 3610 µmhos/cm. In addition, most of this inflow has been <br />observed from seeps that aze within 2,000 feet of the portal. <br />. No specific aeeas of high inflow occurred during development of the SMD. Also, because the panels where sealed <br />sequentially after mining, these areas could not be accessed for the more recent mine inflow surveys, so detailed <br />information on mine inflows for this area could not be obtained. Estimates based on a composite of several prior <br />PR06-07 2.05-135 11/07/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.