My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-02-11_PERMIT FILE - M2007069
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2007069
>
2008-02-11_PERMIT FILE - M2007069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:22:31 PM
Creation date
2/13/2008 9:34:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2007069
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/11/2008
Doc Name
Methodology for the Calculations
From
Young Technology Group
To
LJ Development
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Civil Engineering <br />Punning &. Deveiopment <br />Construction Management <br />Product Development <br />February 8, 2008 <br />L.J. Development, Inc. <br />256 N. Merrill Drive <br />Pueblo West, CO 81007 <br />Attn.: Joseph P. Gagliano <br />Re: Pheasant Run Gravel Pit <br />Division at t~e.^,t~:er~at:on, <br />Mining and Safety <br />Dear Joe: / <br />The Methodology for the calculations regarding the determination of the extent of ditch and groundwater phreatic sur- <br />face, un er a ig me ana , is as o ows: <br />1. The permeability of the material is determined. in this case the value utilized is for clay material. This represents <br />the bottom portion of the canal, which acts like a clay lining. It is true that there is an existing gravel layer between <br />the bottom of the canal and the water table. However, clay is assumed throughout, in order to model a "worse case" <br />scenario. If the permeability for gravel is substituted in column 1 of the spread sheet, then the phreatic surface from <br />the canal drops vertically, from the water surface in the canal, to the groundwater. This is due to the high rate of per- <br />meability of the gravel <br />2. The depth to the water table is assumed. <br />3. The KD value is calculated in the spreadsheet. <br />4. Avoids ratio of i 5% is assumed. <br />5. The value of a is calculated in the spreadsheet. <br />6. The horizontal distance from the water surface in the ditch is assumed. <br />7. The total time during which the ditch is saturated, is assumed to be 8 months. <br />8. The value of X/{{46t)^.5) is calculated by the spreadsheet. From this result, the value of fe^-u^2du/u^2 can be de- <br />termined from table 9. <br />9. A seepage rate of 1 cfs per mile of ditch is assumed <br />10. The height of the phreatic surface, at distance x, is calculated. <br />Please reference the' notes in the spreadsheet, and the tables, for the tabular values. <br />My intent is to show the "worse case" scenario. In reality, the phreatic surface under the canal, will drop straight down to <br />the water table, once the seepage encounters the gravel layer. 1 do not believe that the activity indicated on the plans <br />will affect the water table, or canal seepage, at all. <br />If you have any questions please contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />YOUNG TECHNOLOGY GROUP <br />~o~ <br />Youxc TECtIIaowcY GRO{rn~ Ph: (719) 543.2277 <br />702 PoLK Fa~u (719) 543.2288 <br />Pueblo, Colorado 81004 Emaih kaian1262@aol.com <br />Ken Young P.E., Principal <br />`'~ - ~ 00'7- ©~~ <br />:~~~`~ <br />~FEB 1 12008 <br />Ken Young, P.E., Principal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.