My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:21:02 PM
Creation date
2/7/2008 3:18:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/16/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Subsidence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />7.2 Maximum Horizontal Strain <br />The maximum horizontal tensile strains are the most serious potential hazard with respect to <br />anticipated subsidence impacts from longwall mining in the proposed Red Cliff Mine lease area. <br />This involves protecting the public from larger open fractures, as shown on Figure 20. Tension <br />Crack Over Starter Room, York Canyon Mine, when longwall mining at shallow depths (<500 <br />feet). There is also the temporary potential for large boulders being dislodged from sandstone <br />cliffs on the canyon walls by smaller tensile strains from deeper active longwall panels, as <br />indicated on Figure 18. Ribside Tension Cracks in Road Fill and Cliff Face, York Canyon <br />Mine. <br />Table 10. Predicted Surface Fracture Widths Based on York Canyon Mine Measurements <br />presents the relationship between predicted tensile strain and the measured width of selected <br />open subsidence fractures above three longwall panels at the York Canyon Mine west of Raton <br />New Mexico. The York Canyon Mine was mining coal in the Mesaverde Group, but the <br />overburden lithology could well differ from that present at the Red Cliff Mine proposed Project <br />Area. <br />The horizontal tensile strain over the barrier pillars between panel groups will probably increase <br />because the strain at the surface over the barrier pillar caused be each adjacent panel is <br />additive. It is possible that the maximum horizontal tensile strain above the larger barrier pillars <br />planned between panel groups could as much as double the tensile strain on the surface over <br />the center of such a barrier pillar. This is possible because it depends on the panels on both <br />sides being subcritical precisely enough to place the maximum tensile strain at the center of the <br />barrier pillar. For example, using Figure 12. NCB Horizontal Strain Profile Graph in Affected <br />Environment/Subsidence, the center of an 1000-foot wide panel at the depth of 2000 feet (Panel <br />Width/Depth Ratio = 0.500) is 600 feet from the center of a 200-foot wide barrier pillar, 0.300 <br />times the 2000-foot depth. The predicted tensile strain over the center of the barrier pillar from <br />the first longwall panel to be completed on one side of the group barrier pillar is 95% of the <br />predicted maximum horizontal tensile strain. If a longwall panel group with the same dimensions <br />and depth is mined on the other side of the barrier pillar is completed it would add 95% of its <br />maximum horizontal tensile strain at the center of the 200-foot barrier pillar, nearly doubling <br />(approximately 1.9 times) the tensile strain at that location, and similarly increase the width of <br />the predicted open fracture. The total additive tensile strain at other locations along the <br />overlapping strain profiles could be conservatively predicted by superimposing the subsidence <br />profiles from the two adjacent longwall panels. The rapidly changing overburden depths at the <br />Red Cliff Mine Project Area could make estimating the total tensile strains across barrier pillars <br />using the NCB method a time consuming process. <br />7.3 Maximum Tilt (G) <br />The maximum slope or tilt change as the result of mining a longwall panel occurs at the <br />inflection point between bending progressively more downward toward the center of the panel to <br />bending progressively less downward closer to the center of the panel. On Figure 4. Plan View <br />of Surface Subsidence Over a Longwall Panel in Affected Environment/Subsidence, this is <br />the 0.50 Smax contour line. With the exception of subcritical panels, where the panel width is <br />less than approximately 0.41 times the panel depth, the inflection line is within the <br />Page 35 of 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.