My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:21:02 PM
Creation date
2/7/2008 3:18:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/16/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Subsidence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />cover and, therefore, 1-foot wide surface fractures opening when undermined by a longwall <br />panel at the shallower depths, under approximately 500 feet. The conductivity of the valley fill <br />alluvium in the valley bottoms will potentially increase when longwall mining is performed under <br />the valleys. No loss of surface or groundwater into the mine should occur, provided the fracture <br />zone is not intersected. <br />7.0 PREDICTED SUBSIDENCE OVER THE RED CLIFF MINE PROJECT AREA <br />The NCB subsidence effects prediction method was used to estimate worst-case maximum <br />vertical subsidence (Smax), maximum tensile (+E) and compressive (-E) strains and maximum <br />slope change or tilt (Gmax) as the result of longwall mining 11 feet of coal at depths of 200 feet, <br />500 feet, 1000 feet, 1500 feet and 2000 feet employing the potential 800-foot wide, 900-foot <br />wide, 1000-foot wide, 1100-foot and 1200-foot wide longwall panels. In addition, the location of <br />maximum vertical subsidence, maximum tensile strain, maximum compressive strain and <br />maximum slope change with respect to the centerline of the panel conditions described above <br />were calculated. Prediction of the maximum surface fracture widths were made using fracture <br />measurements collected at the York Canyon Mine and NCB calculated tensile strains for the <br />fracture measurement locations relative to the underlying mined longwall panels. <br />7.1 Maximum Vertical Subsidence (Smax) <br />By itself, simply vertically lowering the ground surface would not be a problem. However, the <br />ground surface is' only lowered over and near a longwall panel as the coal between the panel <br />headgate and tailgate pillars is progressively extracted and the longwall face is advanced. The <br />surface subsidence trough advances with the longwall face and all sides of the longwall panel <br />deflect downward toward the center of the panel, where the vertical subsidence is maximum. <br />The bending of the overburden develops as the longwall panel progresses and forms a stable <br />semi-permanent trough after the panel is completely mined. The maximum vertical subsidence <br />over a panel is of major importance because it contributes to the magnitude of extension, <br />compression and tilting. These subsidence effects can potentially damage surface and <br />underground structures, infrastructure improvements and hydrologic features as well as <br />potentially adversely impacting nearby overlying and underlying coal seams. All such features <br />have a limited tolerance for these potentially adverse effects. The magnitude of the potentially <br />adverse impacts is directly related to the maximum subsidence, i.e. the greater the subsidence <br />the greater the magnitude of the impact, provided the depth and panel dimensions do not <br />change. The magnitude of the potentially adverse surface impacts is inversely related to the <br />mining depth, i.e. the magnitude of potentially adverse impacts decrease as the mining depth <br />increases. Great Britain has lead the world in researching these relationships because every <br />major metropolitan area, except London, was underlain by multiple mineable coal seams. It is <br />possible to somewhat mitigate the adverse impacts by varying panel width, by designing <br />gateroad pillars between panels to yield when the first of two adjacent panels is mined and <br />crush after the face of the second panel is mined past and by positioning longwall panels with <br />respect to a particularly important surface feature. <br />The conservative NCB maximum vertical subsidence prediction for supercritical longwall panel <br />widths is 0.9 times the mining height (m) for overburden has been previously subsided. The <br />NCB method specifies that the previously subsided maximum vertical subsidence prediction be <br />multiplied by 0.9 for ground that has not been previously subsided. The adjustment for <br />previously unmined ground is referred to as the "virgin" ground correction in Great Britain. <br />Subsidence over the proposed Red Cliff Mine Project Area was analyzed as virgin ground <br />because none of the proposed lease area appears to have been previously mined. The overall <br />supercritical subsidence factor for virgin ground is 0.81 times the mining height. <br />Page 30 of 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.