My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2008-01-16_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:21:02 PM
Creation date
2/7/2008 3:18:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
1/16/2008
Doc Name
Preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Subsidence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />from Peng, 1992, p. 7), predicts the height of the fracture zone based on the competency of the <br />overburden as indicated by the unconfined compression strength. The results of the application <br />of this table to the planned 11-foot mining height at the Red Cliff Mine could result in the fracture <br />zone extending 183 feet or 16.6 mining heights up into the overburden if that overburden were <br />entirely "Hard and strong rock"; to a potential height of 123 feet or 11.2 mining heights if the <br />overburden were "Medium hard rock"; to a potential height of 71.5 feet or 6.5 mining heights if <br />that overburden were entirely "Soft and weak rock" overburden; to a potential height of 44.4 feet <br />or 4 mining heights if that overburden were entirely "Weathered soft and weak rock" overburden. <br />The Mesaverde Group overburden is a laterally and vertically variable mixture of sandstone, <br />argillaceous shale/mudstone, siltstone and coal. Table 5. Lithologic Distributions for <br />Dorchester Project Overburden, containing the lithologic logs from 13,880 feet of drilling for <br />19 drill holes at the nearby Dorchester Project site, indicates the probable considerable <br />variability at the Red Cliff Mine Project Area. The probably dominant sandstone lithology, <br />around 46%, could not be considered the Hard and strong rock" with uniaxial compression <br />strength greater than 5888 psi indicated on Table 7. The fact that it is a cliff former where <br />present in canyon walls suggests it is locally probably in the range for "Medium hard rock". On <br />the other end of the scale, the "Weathered soft and weak rock" does not fit the overburden, <br />because it is not weathered. Therefore it is recommended that the maximum height of the <br />fracture zone for planning should be a weighted average of 46% "Medium hard rock" and 54% <br />"Soft and weak rock", for a worst case estimate for the fractured zone height as 95 feet. <br />0.46 times 123 feet plus 0.54 times 71.5 feet =,95 feet <br />The potential for draining surface water into the Red Cliff Mine is low, but probably precludes <br />longwall mining under stream courses and water impoundments when the bedrock overburden <br />thickness is less than 95 feet. Consideration should be given to geophysically measuring the <br />thickness of alluvium beneath valley where the total overburden thickness above the Cameo <br />Seam is 200 feet or less, as shown on Figure 13. Overburden and Outcrop Map for the <br />Project Area. <br />Page 26 of 57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.