Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />_ia~~~ <br />~. ~, <br />iY ~ y <br />•a' .L ~ y <br />1~.~ •• <br />1 .,~.~ ~ <br />~~ <br />'li •!'R!a' I _ •. ~FMA"'~"- 'Y.s~ ~J..54~wt rT '~C~,~ <br />. ~ <br /> ~~ <br />~ <br />ti 1 4 <br />t <br />1. <br />~.> ., t' .. ~ ~. l'r <br />:~ <br />*_ .1 /f. , <br />l • t <br />,,.{ 1 a <br />y ~ •`w~ ,..~w~f. t.\~ fw w a • •1`'a ~. ~ <br />~+ ~F. <br /> • <br />, i. • <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ~L <br />~.7 <br />~ <br /> s <br />i ,, <br /> <br /> <br />Photo I - SW' ~ll~ [313 fZoacf and ?7O U fZoa~i Intrr~~•4~~il~n <br />could affect the total soil thicknesses that can be replaced over these areas. WFC is <br />investigating this situation with a certified soil scientist (Walsh Enviromental.) <br />One example of this is the area immediately southwest of the intersection of BB Road <br />and 2700 Road. Photo 1 shows this area disturbed for topsoil salvage. As can be <br />seen in the photo below, the topsoil thickness is fairly shallow .The material below <br />this level had high levels of calcium carbonate. The nearest pre-mine soil survey test <br />locations are #1, #2 and #8. The available thicknesses of the strippable horizons at <br />these 3 sites are 34 inches, 33 inches and 42 inches respectively. This is shown on <br />Map 2.04.9 Pre-Mine Soils. <br />A deficiency in salvage also occurred in the eastern part of the mining area as stated <br />in Section 2.05.4(2)(d) Topsoil Redistribution and included here. "The topsoil <br />balance study also shows the 15 acres of soil type D70B was originally over reported. <br />WFC knew this because when the topsoil was being salvaged in 1993, we were not <br />f age 2 of 10 <br />