Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical /Environmental Engineering • Materials Testing <br />August 20, 2007 <br />Peabody Energy <br />P.O. Box 670 <br />Hayden, CO 81639 <br />Attn: Roy Karo <br />Job Number: 07-7600 <br />Subject: Slope Stability Evaluation, Proposed Pond <br />12A, Yoast Mine, Routt County, Colorado. <br />Gentlemen: <br />As requested, NWCC, Inc. has completed a Slope Stability Evaluation of the proposed embankment slopes to be <br />constructed for the proposed Pond 12A to be constructed at the Yoast Mine in Routt County, Colorado. The purpose <br />of this stability evaluation was to calculate the factor of safety under static conditions for the proposed design <br />conditions of Pond 12A embankment in order to document design compliance with applicable regulatory standards <br />under Rule 4.05.9(8)(b). <br />Methodology: The stability of proposed embankment structure was assessed by computing theoretical factors of <br />safety (against slope failure) for the proposed slope configurations. A factor of safety in this case is calculated by <br />summing the forces resisting slope movement (i.e. soil strength generated along a theoretical failure plane) and dividing <br />that sum by the driving forces of the slope (i.e. the weight or mass of the soil and groundwater). We have chosen a <br />minimum factor of safety of 1.5 for this project. <br />By inputting slope geometry and soil strength values into the slope stability program SB-SLOPE, strength and <br />geometry values can be easily varied to help assess the factors of safety for the proposed slopes under varying <br />conditions. This program is a comprehensive slope stability program for microcomputers and uses the "Simplified <br />Bishop Method of Slices" for factor of safety calculations. The slope configurations used in our analysis were obtained <br />from the cross section drawing (Exhibit 13-12.7) provided by the client and dated July 2007. A copy of this cross <br />section that shows the dam configuration at its highest point is provided in Appendix A. The slope stability analyses <br />and data are presented in Appendix B and a discussion and summary of the results are discussed below. <br />Procedure: The analyses were completed on the maximum embankment section that will be constructed with an <br />upstream slope configuration of 3(H) to 1(V) and a downstream slope configuration of 3(H) to 1(V). The first case that <br />was analyzed was with the reservoir full and water at the principal spillway elevation (7344.5'). A phreatic surface has <br />also been added to this model to analyze the embankment under a full reservoir condition with steady state seepage. <br />The second case illustrated represents the same cross section with a rapid drawdown condition. In both cases, the <br />slopes were analyzed for what was considered to be the most likely failure modes: (1) A failure of the downstream <br />embankment slope during peak water storage and; (2) A failure of the upstream embankment face after a rapid <br />drawdown of impounded water. These analyses were conducted using conservative strength estimates based on the <br />laboratpry test results completed on remolded samples of the proposed fill materials, as well as estimated soil shear <br />(970) 879-7888 • Fax (970) 879-7891 <br />2580 Copper Ridge Drive • Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 <br />