My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-12-11_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1982112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1982112
>
2007-12-11_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1982112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2020 9:53:43 AM
Creation date
1/30/2008 9:14:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982112
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
12/11/2007
Doc Name
SUP - AM-01
From
Elbert County
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Gen. Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. Geology <br />A. General Geology of site -The sand to be mined in this operation was deposited <br />primarily by a blend of alluvial (water-borne) processes and aeolian (wind-borne) <br />processes. It appears that the sand deposits here were laid down well within the <br />last million years as streams flowed from the Palmer Divide to the north into the <br />Colorado Piedmont and thence on to the Mississippi River and the Gulf of <br />Mexico. Because most of the sand appears to have an alluvial source, deposits <br />tend to exhibit a high degree ofnon-uniform distribution. This was caused by <br />meandering of the ancient streams that deposited the material. Mining of this sand <br />sometimes involves simply excavating a large area where sand was deposited, but <br />other times it amounts to "chasing" a seam of sand across an area. Sometimes, <br />individual pockets of sand are separated by areas where there is no sand of any <br />significance. Exploration of this deposit at this location showed a fairly high <br />consistency in the deposit over the entire area, but a few areas did show locations <br />where sand was weak and finer particle sizes more prominent. Because this <br />operation produces both high quality sand for specialized uses as well as a <br />material often called construction fill, the variations found in the deposit are well <br />within the expected range of variation. Based on the exploratory pits, made with a <br />backhoe and immediately filled back in, nearly all of the site contains sand of <br />suitable quality. However, the actual depth of the sand is probably greater than the <br />mining operation can mine. There appears to be deeper material present, but it is <br />generally below the water table. Because complex water right and water use issues <br />develop when groundwater is exposed, no mining will extend below the level of <br />the water table and generally it will only go as deep as the point where moist, soft <br />sand is encountered. That invariably indicates the water table is only a few feet <br />deeper than the current surface. Staying on firm ground when conducting the <br />operation is important because if the water table is approached closely the sand <br />sometimes exhibits quicksand-like characteristics which causes equipment to <br />become stuck. When that occurs, the lost time and the cost of extracting the <br />equipment can cause the cost of mining to exceed the value of the product. When <br />that is added to the complications of exposing the groundwater, it is rarely worth <br />the effort to mine that deeply when the product is only sand. This is further <br />discussed in Appendix B which is the mining plan from the Reclamation Permit <br />amendment. <br />Miller Gravel Pit -Special Use Permit Page 9 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.