My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-12-11_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1982112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1982112
>
2007-12-11_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1982112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2020 9:53:43 AM
Creation date
1/30/2008 9:14:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982112
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
12/11/2007
Doc Name
SUP - AM-01
From
Elbert County
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Gen. Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
important to protect as they are vital wildlife habitats, are important to maintaining water <br />quality, and are often very attractive tree lined corridors winding through an otherwise <br />open, grass dominated prairie setting. This mining operation is located near the bottom of <br />a valley rather than on a ridge or mesa. It is located adjacent to a riparian corridor, but <br />does not encroach on that corridor or adversely affect it. The only impact on the riparian <br />corridor stems from the private road (shown on maps as Hunt Road) that crosses Running <br />Creek just west of the mining operation, but this road exists for purposes other than the <br />mining operation and accesses other property to the east of this site. It would therefore be <br />concluded that this mining operation complies with this requirement. <br />4 <br />5 <br />Avoid conflicts with residential developments, agricultural uses, wildlife, <br />environmentally sensitive areas, and visually sensitive areas - These potential <br />conflicts are more thoroughly discussed in other sections of this application, but suffice it <br />to say for now that conflicts with these uses are judged as being minimal. <br />Environmental suitability standards <br />A. Selection of the least environmental constraints impacted - Mining can have <br />severe impacts on many environmental resources. Sometimes, these impacts <br />cannot be avoided simply because the material to be mined is in a sensitive <br />location. In those cases, a choice must be made as to whether the material to be <br />mined is so valuable and so scarce in less sensitive areas that it must be extracted <br />from that site. With regard to this operation, there is undoubtedly some sand (and <br />perhaps gravel) in the Running Creek riparian corridor. Those locations typically <br />contain just those kinds of materials. But no mining will occur in that area. Instead <br />the mining is restricted to the dry hillsides adjacent to the riparian corridor where <br />resource impacts on wildlife and agricultural resources are far less severe. <br />B. Minimization of environmental disturbance - Conducting mining operations <br />creates severe environmental disturbance at the location of the mine, irrespective <br />of the type of mining done. Besides considering the location of the operation, as <br />discussed in item A above, there must be consideration of how to mitigate the <br />impacts that do occur. In Colorado this function is largely regulated by the <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board through a permitting process. The <br />permits must address these specific issues in a way that demonstrates to the <br />satisfaction of the Board that whatever impacts do occur are minimized and <br />Miller Gravel Pit -Special Use Permit Page 7 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.