Laserfiche WebLink
Table 7 Summary of Unit Weights for Dam Stability Modeling <br /> Unit Wei ht <br />Material Sat ~ motsc ~ <br />Existing Materials <br />Embankment Material 132 110 <br />Soft Sediment 119 90 <br />Colluvium 130 108 <br />Failure Surface Material 130 108 <br />Weathered Bedrock* - <br />Pro osed Materials <br />Buttress 132 110 <br />Downstream Drains a Blanket 130 120 <br />U stream Cla Blanket 132 110 <br />~- i nis maienai was assumes to ~e mtmitely strong In the model, <br />thus unit weights were not assigned. <br />8.2.2.2 Embankment Material <br />The shear strength of the embanlanent material was obtained from triaxial (TX) and direct shear (DS) <br />tests. Figure 7 shows the undrained shear strength envelope measured in the triaxial test with pore- <br />water pressure measurements. For comparison purposes, the envelope used in the previous analysis <br />is shown in Figure 7. The value used for stability modeling is ~~„ of 25.8 degrees with no cohesion. <br />This value is considered conservative because it yields lower strength than using cohesion and <br />friction (i.e. dashed line in Figure 3). Therefore, the embankment material was modeled with a ~~„ of <br />25.8 degrees for the USSA. <br />Figure 8 shows the drained shear strength envelope based on triaxial and direct shear tests. It can be <br />seen from Figure 8 that the drained failure envelope yields a drained friction angle of 32.2 degrees. <br />The results from both the triaxial and direct shear tests display fairly consistent results. Therefore, <br />the embankment material was modeled with a friction angle of 32.2 degrees for the ESSA. <br />8.2.2.3 Soft Sediment <br />The shear strength of the soft sediment was measured in the triaxial (TX) and direct shear (DS) <br />apparatus. The results of the triaxial tests yield an undrained failure envelope of ~~~ 29.4 degrees <br />with c=0.43 tsf. This value is considered high and non-representative of material with soft <br />consistency. A further review of the stress-strain relationship from the triaxial tests revealed that the <br />tested material exhibited dilative behavior and negative shear induced pore-water pressures were <br />developed during shear. Soft sediment material showing low blow counts from SPT in the range of 0 <br />(weight of hammer) to 7 blows/ft, with typical values between 3 and 6 blows/ft, is expected to exhibit <br />P:\Mpls\06 CO\26\0626067\WorkFiles\DesignReport\FINAL\DesignReportFINAL.doc 26 <br />