My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-01-15_PERMIT FILE - M2007044 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2007044
>
2008-01-15_PERMIT FILE - M2007044 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:21:01 PM
Creation date
1/17/2008 10:02:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2007044
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/15/2008
Doc Name
Response to PAR
From
Energy Fuels Resources Corporation
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Energy Fuels does not have access to the historic drill logs for the mines located in Lumsden Canyon, so <br />it is not possible to prepare a detailed geologic cross section of the mining area. Our exploration activities <br />in 2007 do, however, support the interpretation of geology and ground water that was developed by <br />Umetco, which previously operated many of the uranium mines on Beaver Mesa. Based on drilling <br />completed in 2007 and inspection of the Whirlwind decline, two schematic cross sections of the local <br />lithology were developed. Figure 1 shows the location of the two cross sections. Figure 2 presents a <br />northwest to southeast cross section (A-A~ from four exploration drill holes to the lower level of the <br />Whirlwind decline while Figure 3 shows a northeast to southwest cross section through the center of the <br />decline. Known contacts are shown with a solid line while inferred contacts are shown with a dashed line. <br />Review of Figure 2 shows that the lower Burro Canyon aquifer and the middle and lower Brushy Basin <br />water-bearing zones described in the permit applications and U.S. Environmental Service Report on <br />Boring BM00-1 (see Appendix C of the permit applications) are present in the new exploration holes. 'This <br />is not surprising, as these holes were all drilled within 850 feet of Monitoring Well BM00-1 where Umetco <br />conducted their pumping tests in the fall of 2000. The Umetco boring also delineated an upper Brushy <br />Basin water-bearing zone that was distinct from the basal sandstone of the Burro Canyon. In the case of <br />the exploration holes, however, the mudstone/shale partings between the sandstone lenses in this zone <br />were not large enough to justify delineation of an upper Brushy Basin water-bearing zone distinct from <br />the Burro Canyon aquifer. <br />The variability of the sandstone lenses is apparent on Figure 2 as the thickness and mudstone/shale <br />partings vary noticeably from hole to hole. As shown on the lower right-hand side of Figure 2, the lower <br />sandstone lens of the Brushy Basin is very thin with numerous shale/mudstone partings where it <br />intersects the Whirlwind decline. It does not appear that this lens, which is making water, continues much <br />further to the southeast. Without more information between the holes and the decline, it is also entirely <br />possible that the sandstone in the decline is not connected to the sandstone encountered in the drill holes. <br />The water flowing into the decline is responsible for the water pool that existed in the lowest portion of <br />the decline and the approximately 700 feet of mine drift over a period of about 20 years. It is interesting <br />to note that ground water could not be produced from the upper Salt Wash sandstone in Umetco's Boring <br />BM00-1, even though it was only 200 feet from the flooded mine workings. <br />Figure 3presents across-section through the decline. The decline starts at the surface immediately below <br />where the middle sand lens of the Brushy Basin would outcrop if it were present. Some sandstone <br />outcrops do exist in this area; however, there are no seeps along these outcrops that would indicate a <br />source of ground water. As shown, water flows into the decline near its base at an approximate rate of 1.5 <br />gpm. This ground water appears to originate from the lowest sand lens in the Brushy Basin, which as <br />discussed above, is very thin with multiple shale/mudstone partings where it intersects the decline. <br />Another very thin sandstone lens (< 5 feet thick) was identified further up in the decline; however, this <br />sand lens does not produce measurable water. There is, however, a damp spot on the rib and sill for 30 to <br />40 feet. <br />Plugging information and drilling logs are attached for the 14 exploration holes drilled in Colorado and <br />the 14 exploration holes drilled in Utah in 2007. The logs indicate that the Burro Canyon and two Brushy <br />Basin sandstone lenses are present at most locations. However, in some locations, the upper of the two <br />lenses is very thin or absent altogether. <br />Exploration drilling also indicated that the sandstone lenses produce relatively little water. When geologic <br />formations are dry, they typically can be drilled without adding water. When a small amount of water is <br />produced, it is usually necessary to add additional water to carry the wetted cuttings out of the hole. When <br />a lot of water is produced or when the formations are unstable, bentonite is added to the injected water. <br />In the 28 holes drilled on the Whirlwind property, 5 of the 28 holes were drilled without injecting water. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.