My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-01-15_PERMIT FILE - M2007044 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2007044
>
2008-01-15_PERMIT FILE - M2007044 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:21:01 PM
Creation date
1/17/2008 10:02:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2007044
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/15/2008
Doc Name
Response to PAR
From
Energy Fuels Resources Corporation
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
could increase to as much as 30 mg/L for FeSO4 and 100 mg/L for BaCI depending <br />on contaminant levels and chemical interference. Most of the sulfate, barium and iron <br />are desi neg d to precipitate out in the sludge. Chloride is relatively soluble and most <br />will enter into solution. The average constituent concentration levels in the existing <br />mine water, the maximum amount of chemicals that may be added, and regulatory <br />limits are listed below for reference purposes. <br />FeSO4: Maximum dosage = 30 mg/L <br />Existing Sulfate Concentration in Water: 100 mglL <br />Total Sulfate Added: 21.6 mg/L <br />Regulatory Limit: 250 mg/L <br />Existing Iron Concentration in Water: 0.10 mg/L <br />Total Iron Added: 8.4 mg/L <br />Regulatory Standard: see below <br />BaCI: Maximum dosage = 100 mgt <br />Existing Barium Concentration in Water: 0.2 mg/L <br />Total Barium Added: 79.5 mg/L <br />Regulatory Limit: none apply <br />Existing Chloride Concentration in Water: 25 mg/L <br />Total Chloride Added: 20.5 mg/L <br />Regulatory Standard: 250 mg/L <br />The data above indicate that the addition of sulfate and chloride cannot result in an <br />exceedance of regulatory standards. Concentrations of both iron and barium could <br />theoretically increase to levels above drinking water standards; however, drinking <br />water standards do not apply to mine water discharge. The 0.3 mg/L secondary iron <br />standard for drinking water is clearly not applicable to this situation, as the standard <br />was established to prevent staining of clothes and fixtures. The State of Colorado has <br />not established an iron standard for the segment of the Dolores River into which <br />Lumsden Canyon discharges. Surface water standards of 0.3 to 1 mg/L are common <br />at other locations where elevated iron levels are problematic. The agricultural <br />standard for iron, which is 5 mg/L, may be the most relevant standard in this case. <br />The only barium standards are for drinking water (1 to 2 mg/I.,) and would not be <br />applicable to the mine discharge. <br />Because of the potential to exceed an applicable regulatory standard, dissolved iron <br />will be added to the weekly sampling and analysis of treated mine water. Iron will not <br />be added to the stormwater sampling program because it is only present in the ore and <br />waste rock in small concentrations and would not be expected to be present in surface <br />water runoff. <br />1:.i~eig~ I~uc;l5 ltesaar~cs Cc}rporati«~~ ~~ C~ni<~r~ I3c~ulevaed, Staite Ei0{) 6 <br />l.,~al:ew~c~c~c~l. C`O $012 Phc~i7e: 3t}3-97~-21=i0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.