My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-01-10_PERMIT FILE - M2008002
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008002
>
2008-01-10_PERMIT FILE - M2008002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2023 9:17:44 AM
Creation date
1/11/2008 1:53:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008002
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
1/10/2008
Doc Name
New 110c Appl. Submittal
From
Western Gravel, LLLC.
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Limited-Results Cultural Resource Survey Form <br />(page 3 of 3) <br />V. LITERATURE REVIEW (continued) <br />25. Known Cultural Resources <br />In the project azea: -None in the project area. <br />In the general region: The nearest cultural resources to the project azea are SRB661, an historic ranch <br />and SRB2662, an historic road. Additionally overviews of the prehistory and history of the region <br />aze provided in the Colorado Historical Society,_.publications entitled "Colorado Prehistory A Context <br />for the Northern Colorado River Basin" (Reed and Metcalf 19991 and "Colorado Plateau Country <br />Historic Context"(Husband 19841. <br />26. Expected Results: Limited cultural resources were expected because of the barren: open terrain... <br />VI. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES <br />27. The purpose of the study was to identify-.and-record all cultural remains over SO years old within--the . _ __ :.._~ <br />area of potential impact, to assess~their significance and eli ibility to the National Register of Historic _:_ ..:~~:: <br />Places (NRHP), and to make recommendations concerning management. If Qossible, the remains will. _ .' _ <br />add to our understanding of the prehistory and history of the region. _ <br />VII. FIELD METHODS <br />28. Definitions: Site Sites were defined by the presence of six or more artifacts and/or significant . . _ _ .. _._.__ <br />feature(s) indicative of patterned human activity that were determined to be at least_5.O. years_old..-__________ <br />IF Single activity remains usuallyrepresented by the presence of 1 to 5 artifacts apparently of <br />surficial nature. - <br />29. Descnbe Survey Method: A 100_percent pedestrian cultural resources-survey ofthe=linear route was.. :._~_. <br />walked by one archaeologist in zigzag transects spaced at 15 meter intervals centered on the flagged.. _ . _ .. <br />. ,stakes to cover a corridor 60 meters 0200 feet). wide. The archaeologist-worked from USGS•7:5__..__:~:~. <br />minute series maps. ...__. <br />VIII. RESULTS <br />30. List IFs if applicable. Indicate IF locations on the map completed for Part III. <br />A. Smithsonian Number: None Description: <br />31. Using your professional knowledge of the region, why aze there none or very limited cultural <br />I;~ remains in the project area? Is there subsurface potential? . <br />The low density of sites and isolated finds in this area is attributed to the barren, open terrain and lack <br />of shelter. There is no subsurface ~tential_ _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.