Laserfiche WebLink
1. The plan implies, but does not state, or provide demonstration in the form of analysis and design, that <br />the up gradient structures (water bars, bar ditches, berms) will completely divert the 25-year, 6-hour <br />storm around the affected land. If the analysis and designs are not elsewhere in the permit, then they <br />need to be provided. <br />2. The plan states that the only pollutant of concern is suspended solids (or as they incorrectly refer to it, <br />sediment. The plan further states that the only discharges will be storm water. However, there will be <br />an ore stockpile, and the uranium in the ore is quite soluble, so uranium is also a pollutant of concern. <br />And although runoff from the ore stockpile may meet the regulatory definition of storm water, the <br />quality of the water maybe significantly impacted. The Health Department, DRMS and BLM's <br />authority provides that special handling of certain storm water maybe required on a case-by-case basis. <br />Unless they can demonstrate that the ore pile runoff will not be contaminated, DRMS may require that <br />ore pile water be segregated from other storm water and be separately evaporated or otherwise <br />managed/treated. <br />3. The plan proposes complete capture of the 25-year, 6-hour event runoff from the affected land in a <br />sediment pond. No outlet works or discharge facilities for the pond are proposed. The State Engineer <br />requires that water captured out of priority be released within 72 hours. How will the Operator comply <br />with this mandate? <br />4. Since the pond will have no outlet works, it will likely overtop and fail during an event larger than the <br />25-year, 6-hour event, or if there is a series of smaller events in sequence without sufficient intervening <br />time for the pond to recover its capacity through evaporation. The Operator must provide an analysis of <br />the consequences of a 100-year storm on the up gradient controls, the mine area, the pond, and the <br />receiving stream. If the consequences of failure are significant, the Division may require outlet works in <br />the pond to pass through larger events. <br />As Blue Rock can see these issues are important during start up and development of the mine. Work <br />may start on the December 27, 2007 as planned. However until these issues are addressed to DRMS <br />satisfaction all work should be confined to establishing the portal and staging area. Although it is very <br />unlikely at this stage of development: no ore may be deposited on the surface until Blue Rock receives <br />DRMS approval in writing. Blue Rock needs to construct berms and use silt fencing to ensure zero <br />stormwater run-off from the work area until the stormwater management plan is reviewed and approved <br />by DRMS. <br />If you need additional information, please contact me at the Division of Reclamation, Mining and <br />Safety, Grand Junction Field Office, 101 S. 3rd St., Suite 301, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, <br />telephone no. 970.241.1117. <br />Sincerely, <br />•~ "J <br />G. Russel Means <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Cc: Lynn Lewis, BLM Uncompahgre Regional Office <br />Cc: Allen Sorenson, DRMS Engineer, Denver (e-mail) <br />Cc: Carl Mount, DRMS Senior EPS, North Supervisor. <br />