My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-08-17_PERMIT FILE - C1981035 (38)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2007-08-17_PERMIT FILE - C1981035 (38)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:17:41 PM
Creation date
12/6/2007 11:20:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
8/17/2007
Doc Name
Cultural and Historic Resource Survey
Section_Exhibit Name
KI Appendix 03
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• <br />COLORADO <br />HISTORICAL <br />SOCIETY <br /> <br />The Colorado Heritage Center 1300 Broadway Denver. Colorado 80203 <br />•March 4, 1980 <br />~ - `/ <br />Alan Salter <br />General Manager <br />King real Mine <br />4424 County Road 120 <br />Hesperus, CO 81326 <br />Dear Mr. Salter: <br />This office received your correspondence of February 21, 1980, <br />requesting a 1) statement for. the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Board concerning the cultural-historical impact 'of the King Coal Mine <br />operation, as_ well as 2) information for the proposed federal lease. <br />•We conducted a file search of the Colorado Archaeological Site <br />Inventory and the Colorado Inventory of Historic Sites, as well as <br />nominations pending or on the National Register of Historic Places; <br />for Township 35N, Range 11W, and Sections 21 and 32, which would in- <br />elude the boundaries for the mine bench, the current federal coal ' <br />lease, and the application for coal lease. <br />There are no known Archaeological or Historical/Architectural <br />resources in the impact area of the proposed undertaking. <br />Based on the information supplied in your correspondence, it <br />appears-that there would no no further impact to cultural resources <br />due to the seriously disturbed nature of the terrain in the 8.36 acres <br />of the mine-bench area. <br />However, despite the fact that there will be no surface disturb- <br />ances in the proposed coal lease area, these mining operations-will <br />possibly create an indirect impact on potentially eligible cultural <br />resources due to the potential for vandalism on cultural resources. <br />There is always•the possibility that unidentified Cultural Resources <br />exist within this area. Therefore. a professional survey should be <br />conducted to Identif}t any Eligible Cultural Resources in the propased <br />project area. '-~: <br />As you Irnow, the ultimate responsibility for compliance with the <br />Pational Historic Preservation Act. as implemented in 36 CFR 800, <br />remains with the federal agency and cannot be delegated by it. The <br />~,~ <br />1 ~ -. <br />November 1993 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.