My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-08-17_PERMIT FILE - C1981035 (37)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2007-08-17_PERMIT FILE - C1981035 (37)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:17:41 PM
Creation date
12/6/2007 11:14:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
8/17/2007
Doc Name
Unsuitability Analysis and Report
Section_Exhibit Name
KI Appendix 01
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Exception: In accordance with 30 CFR 211.31 and 30 CFR 817.121 <br />`' " ~ sv ficient coal Hill be left in-place in Pine Gulch to prevent <br />~' subsidence, so there will be no substantial threat of loss to• <br />people or property and to the natural and beneficial values of the <br />Yi' ~ floodplain on the lease tract and downstream. <br />Criterion Number 17 -- Municipal Watersheds <br />Anatys~s: None of the land referred to in this document is used as <br />a mun~c~pal watershed. - <br />- ~ "~ <br />Criterion Number •18 -- National Resource Waters <br />Anal sis: None of this area has been designated by the State of <br />0 orado as National Resource Waters. - <br />Criterion [umber 19 -- Alluvial Va11ey.Floors ~. <br />Analysis: The upper reach of Pine Gulch, within the proposed lease <br />are- a des not constitute an alluvial valley floor. However, this - <br />- criterion may apply below the lease area where Pine Gulch merges <br />into Nay Gulch. The appropriate mitigation will be necessary to <br />maintain the integrity of flow in Pine~Gulch over the lease area. <br />~' <br />Criterion Number 20 -- State Criteria <br />Analysis: No State Criteria have been proposed or adopted by <br />Colorado. <br />..~ <br />• <br />Summa r <br />It is the conclusion of the unsuitability analysis that no part of the <br />160-acre site is unsuitable for mining operations. Subsidence which <br />would affect water discharge rates, water flow patterns, water quality, <br />soil erosion, vegetation, wildlife, and the alluvial valley floor will <br />be mitigated. alining and associated activities shall not be conducted <br />in a fashion that will endanger the integrity of the private surface <br />lands in and near drainages where the overburden is not sufficient to <br />minimize subsidence, should subsidence occur. <br />29 <br />• Na~vember 1993 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.