My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-11-14_REVISION - C1980007
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2007-11-14_REVISION - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:18:24 PM
Creation date
12/3/2007 3:18:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/14/2007
Doc Name
Record of Decision for MCC's E Seam Methane Drainage Wells Project
From
USFS
To
Interested Party
Type & Sequence
TR111
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />711.2A and 711.2B for over-size and over-length vehicles (drill rig and transport of construction <br />equipment). Commercial use of NFSRs is subject to the terms of a Forest Service Road Use <br />Permit. <br />• Decommissioning the Long Draw-Saddle life-of--mine road to an ATV trail by per decisions <br />issued in 2002 and 2006, by 2010. , <br />My decision includes the needed protections for non-mineral resources on NFS lands will be <br />implemented. The protections are given in the Design Criteria of the Proposed Action (as it pertains to <br />the E Seam MDWs and associated access) (Chapter 2 of the FEIS and Appendix C of this document)). <br />My decision includes granting relief to lease stipulations limiting occupancy in riparian areas, <br />wetlands and floodplains. The effects to these areas are. anticipated to occur near the Dry Fork of <br />Minnesota Creek and Lick Creek, and are mainly associated with the upgrade of exiting roads or ATV <br />routes. The effects in these areas are expected to be minimal, and Design Criteria will be used to further <br />minimize effects. Granting this relief is consistent with the Forest Plan, which allows mineral <br />activities in riparian areas, so long as disturbance is minimized and timely reclamation occurs <br />(FEIS, page 8). <br />This decision also acknowledges that some MDW drill locations and temporary road alignments <br />may cross areas of geologic hazards and slopes on which use and occupancy is stipulated in the <br />federal coal leases. .For areas where this situation may be encountered, I approve <br />interdisciplinary team review of physical placement of MDW locations and road alignments <br />during. implementation to further minimize surface disturbance and ensure that proper best <br />management practices are used. <br />The post-mining land use for E Seam MDWs and associated access locations are wildlife habitat, <br />livestock grazing and maintaining aquatic/riparian ecosystem function. Reclamation plans have been <br />designed to support these post-mining land uses (Appendix C). Approval, of the E Seam MDWs and <br />associated access is consistent with the GMUG Forest Plan (Final EIS, Chapter 1, Purpose and Need). <br />When compared to the other alternatives, the selected alternative best meets the purpose and need for the <br />action to facilitate safe and efficient production of compliant and super-compliant coal reserves, and best <br />supports the commitment of the federal government to facilitate production of leased reserves. Further, <br />this alternative allows the federal coal lessee to construct structures and equipment as provided in their <br />lease rights (Final EIS, Chapter 1, Purpose and Need). This alternative supports the Forest Service <br />Minerals Policy to foster and encourage environmentally sound energy and mineral development, and <br />responds to National Energy Policy. <br />Placement of the E Seam MDWs and associated access was achieved through careful review of lease <br />stipulations, current surface resource conditions, and anticipated coal seam conditions; and designed to <br />minimize surface disturbance including best management practices and design criteria for use of NFS <br />lands (see Appendix C). This alternative meets requirements under federal coal program laws and <br />implementing regulations (see Final EIS, Chapter 1, Authorizing Actions), and other applicable natural <br />resource laws (see .Findings Required by Other Laws and Regulation below), and the National <br />Environmental Policy Act. <br />In the event of any contradiction or conflict between descriptions or depictions of authorized actions, my <br />decision is to be taken from the project documents in the following order of precedence: first the <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.