My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-11-23_PERMIT FILE - M2007044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2007044
>
2007-11-23_PERMIT FILE - M2007044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:18:41 PM
Creation date
12/3/2007 12:15:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2007044
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
11/23/2007
Doc Name
Response to comments
From
Energy Fuels Resources Corp
To
BLM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~I~~~ <br />._.: ~. <br />November 19, 2007 <br />~av ~ 0 207 <br />Division of i~eciamation, <br />Mining and Safety <br />Gl ~~'( L//~I~J <br />~~~ <br /> <br />~~ r~ov 2 ~ 200 ; / <br />,/,/,y, GRAND ,flan;.; 3 r,.~r•. ~-;~:1.0 OFFBCE <br />11 ~~ [~14`9vlON t~F <br />ENERGY FUELS RESOURC~~ATioN ~L~iiNii'~r ~: SAFETY <br />CORPORATION <br />Mr. D. Scott Gerwe <br />United States Department of the I erior <br />Bureau of Land Man_ agement <br />2815 HRoad - <br />Grand Junction, CO 81506 / / <br />Re: Response to Commends/, Plan of Operations, Whirlwind Mine ~ - ~-c~c~ 7? ~ o ~~~ <br />Dear Scott: <br />Energy Fuels Resources Corporation (Energy Fuels) has reviewed your request for <br />additional information dated October 17, 2007 and will revise the Plan of Operations to <br />address your concerns. We are still waiting on comments from the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining and Safety (DBMS) and would prefer to update both the Plan of <br />Operations and the DBMS 112d Reclamation Plan at the same time. Although the Plan of <br />Operations and 112d Reclamation Plan are formatted differently, they are consistent with <br />each other and we want to keep it that way to the extent possible. We believe that if we <br />revise each plan at the same time in response to both sets of comments, the two plans will <br />continue to be consistent with each other and accurately represent our plans for the <br />project. <br />We have listed your questions in italics and our responses in regular font below. The <br />revisions to the Plan of Operations will be submitted at a later date once we receive and <br />review comments from the DBMS. The revisions will be submitted as replacement pages. <br />For ease of reference, we will also include one set of replacement pages with all of the <br />revisions highlighted. <br />1. Freshwater source (Page 5 - 23). This indicates that the freshwater source would be <br />nearby springs or wells. However, the recent bulk sampling NOI says DP Spring will not <br />be used. Specify your likely freshwater source. <br />Completion of a potable water well at the project site is not an option because the nearest <br />ground water in the lower Salt Wash formation is of poor quality and the cost to sink a <br />deep well is prohibitive. To date, Energy Fuels has trucked its water to the project from <br />its offices in Nucla. We plan to contact the owners of the water rights for nearby DP <br />Spring (K. Hubbard and J. Hendricks) to see if we can purchase water from them once <br />-z7~-r~y I~t~~'~~ l~c~~~~t;~.•c~;; ~'E~1~~~1c>r~iEi~~~l ~~;} t lt~~r.~tl ~:>~~#~v~s,rc! ~uitc ii1)tl <br />[ .~~C~cti=v„~-~~~I, £'%i ~~O1?f~ 6`E~t_~r~c° ~f~..4)7~-'? i=t{) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.